Saturday, November 2, 2013

Racism and The Racial Bias of Juries in Criminal Trials


Dealing with Racial Bias in Juries

by Bob Vogel
Trial Attorney
Knoxville, TN
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
Graduate, Trial Lawyers College

Imagine being the only dog in a courtroom full of cats. Would you expect to get a fair shake?

_____________________________________________________________________

There, in the audience, as you walk in and take a seat at the defense table, are all the people who might sit on your jury. While they are different ages, different body types, different in hair style, different in gender, they all have one thing in common: they are all white. They sit scattered among the pews of the courtroom. Some in pairs, some in clumps of three or four. Some by themselves. They look serious. They don't smile. They won't look you in the eye. You know they are wondering what you did.

You look over at the next table. There sits the prosecutor. He's about six feet tall, slender and looks like he might work out. He's about fifty, maybe a little older. He wears an off the rack suit that fits him well. He has short, brown hair with a little grey mixed in and brown eyes. He is white. He looks a lot like some of the jurors. He nods toward them from time to time when they catch his eye. They are starting to look at him like he is in charge, like he has power in the courtroom.

Next to him is his assistant. She is tall and attractive. She has on a knee length, black dress, some modest jewelry to compliment her modest haircut and carefully applied makeup. She is pretty, but she has a stern look on her face today: her lips are pinched together and there are some age wrinkles showing around the corner of her mouth and around her narrowed eyes. When she looks at you, her face is hard, without expression. She knows what you did. At least, she thinks she does. But, when she turns toward the jury, she smiles a brilliant, engaging smile. All of the pictures and documents that they prosecutor is going to use to put you in jail sit in neat piles in front of her, ready to be passed to her boss at just the right time in the trial.

Your attorney walks in and sits down next to you. You've met with him a lot. He knows the whole story of your case. He knows you didn't do it - that you maintain your innocence. He's talked to the prosecutor about the case. He's shown you their evidence. The prosecutor wants you to plead to the charge with a minimum amount of jail time, but consecutive to what you're serving now. It will add about a year to your time.

You rejected that offer, because you know you didn't do it. You caught the look on your attorney's face when you did that. And it made you worry a little. Still, you have confidence in him. He wore a good suit, today. He has all his papers ready. He has an assistant with him, too, but she looks a little nervous. He has a nice face and he smiles at you as he sits down. But, still, you notice, he has the same kind of face that the jury and the prosecutor have - all white.

You look around the courtroom. You see several men and women in uniform. Some nod at you. Some look around the courtroom and won't catch your eye. There is a woman fussing with a computer and some flat, table top microphones: the court reporter. She seems preoccupied. Next to the judges bench, the clerk sits in front of a computer terminal. She is typing and looking at documents. They are trying to get some paperwork done before your trial starts. Trials take a long time and interfere with paperwork.

The Judge walks out. "All rise," one of the officers says. "Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye, the Criminal Court for this county is now in session, all those with business before this Court approach and ye shall be heard. God save this honorable Court, the State of here we are and the United States of America." Then he leads everyone in the pledge of allegiance. You glance at your attorney, and you follow his lead, placing your hand on your heart and reciting the pledge. You're maybe a quarter of a beat behind because you haven't had to recite it since your were in grade school. You hope nobody else notices. They all seem to know it perfectly.

Your case is called. The Judge brings a group of people forward and sits them in the jury box. He asks them a bunch of questions and tells them a bunch of stuff. They stare back at him with blank faces. They nod when it seems appropriate. The smile at his jokes even though you don't understand them and you think they probably don't either. But, he is the judge.

Your attorney nods and makes some notes on a pad of paper. You see his assistant doing the same. Across the room, the prosecutor and his helper make notes and are looking at a list of names.

The judge turns the jury over to the attorneys. First, the prosecutor goes. He talks about gangs and gang violence, like you created it, and hopes the jury won't be offended by it. He talks about the fact that the crime happened in prison, but that the jury shouldn't think about that. They are all looking at you like they would look at their shoe after stepping in dog poop. You're starting to wonder why you didn't take the deal.

"Good morning," your attorney, Bob says, "I've been worried about something ever since I learned about this case. After listening to the prosecutor, whose job it is to put Mr. Smith away for as long as he possibly can, I'm just downright scared. I've got a knot in my stomach.

"Take a look at this," Bob says. He walks over to his computer and hits a couple of buttons. A cartoon pops up on the overhead.


"Anybody here want to trade places with Fido?" Bob says. You notice the prosecutor starting to stand up. But, then he decides against it.

"I wonder what it would be like to be in Fido's place? How do you think it would feel? Mr. A? How do you think it would feel to be in Fido's spot?"

Mr. A is not sure how to respond. He shrugs his shoulders, "not too good, I guess."

"I think you're right, Mr. A, not too good. Play along with me, why wouldn't it feel too good?"

"He ain't gonna get too good a deal from them cats," Mr. A says.

"No, he's not, is he?"

"Uhn, uh," Mr. A, says.

You notice that some of the jurors are smiling a little at the cartoon. Bob moves onto someone else.

"Ms. C, I notice you smiling, share with us if you would?"

"It's just funny. I mean, cat's hate dogs, but, I mean, just seeing the animals acting like people, you know, that's funny. But, I kinda feel sorry for the dog."

"Yeah, me too, why do you feel bad for the dog?"

"Well, there's just no way he'll get a fair trial," she says.

"Tell me why you feel that way," Bob says.

"Well..." Ms. C stops. She can't seem to put her thoughts into words.

You notice that an older lady down on the front row is sitting straight up in her seat, trying to get Bob's attention.

"Ms. C, do you want to think about if for a second? I notice Ms. D here really wants to say something?"

"Sure." She is obviously relieved. She looks over at Ms. D. In fact, you notice all the jurors are looking at her, so is the judge and so is the prosecutor and his helper. There are extra jurors behind them in the pews. They are all listening, too.

"Ms. D?" Bob says, motioning toward her, "what are your feelings about this?"

"Well, I get what you're trying to do. I mean, I guess its easier to talk about cats and dogs than people. But, I think I'm a little offended that you feel like we won't be fair with your client, like we'd treat him like a bunch of cats would treat a dog if they got a chance. I'm not too happy about that."

You see the prosecutor smile to himself and look at his assistant. They share a meaningful glance and you see her make a mark on the paper.

"Thank you for sharing, Ms. D," Bob says, as he takes a tiny step forward in her direction. "I'm really glad you shared that with me. So, do you feel that I've misjudged you?"

"Yes. I think you've underestimated us."

"How so?"

"Well, you don't give us enough credit. I mean, I know your client is black. But that doesn't mean I can't be fair to him. Does it?"

"Of course not, and I am so happy to hear you say that. I'm so glad you called me out on this. You are definitely the kind of person I want on this jury. I'm hoping you want to be here?"

"Well, yes," Ms. D says, with a smile of pride on her face.

"Thank you, I'm glad. You know, the reason I brought this up is because I worry about this in me. I worry that there are some racist thoughts deep down inside me," Bob says.

You start to squirm a little. Your lawyer is a racist? Is that what he's saying. You really should have taken that deal. You look over at the prosecutor to see if you connect with him. Maybe he'll give you a break.

The prosecutor is staring at Bob. He seems unsure. He has one eyebrow raised in a question mark.

"I grew up in a small suburban town in New Jersey," Bob continues, "there were two black families in town. One father was the mayor and an Harvard educated college professor. The other was a successful business man - an engineer. Their kids were in high school with me. Aside from the color of their skin, they were just like me. They dressed like me. They acted like me. They took the same classes and had the same interests as me. No difference. We didn't really notice the color of their skin. Although, growing up in the seventies, there was no interracial dating. So, while we all socialized and did things together, they never had dates with our peers.

"Anyway, I lived about 15 miles from Newark and about 25 miles from Harlem and the Bronx. In the sixties and early seventies, there were a bunch of riots there. People burned down buildings. Most of our fathers were blue collar businessmen who owned their own businesses and worked hard in their own businesses. I remember the talk about "them and they". If they come here, if they march here, we'll be ready.

"By "ready," that meant that everyone had a loaded shotgun near an upstairs window. Our fathers were ready to barricade the streets leading into town and put up defenses. "They" were not going to burn down our houses or loot our stores. We weren't going to let them get bused in here, either.

"As I got older, there were always news stories about them. About how heroin was rampaging through the ghetto. How they were stealing, committing crimes, stabbing each other, shooting each other, overdosing, it was like a war. In the eighties it was cocaine and in the nineties it was crack. They committed car jackings, rapes, murder. Newark was the car jacking capital of the world. The Newark police told white people from the suburbs not to stop at stop lights or stop signs after dark.

"It was always them. Always the black drug addicts and dealers. It was the black guy with the knife or the gun or the dope. It was the black guy who murdered and raped. Then came the gangs. In the 90s the gangs started to grow and rage through the streets of Newark and New York. They went "wilding". They tore up stores, ripped people off, mugged people, raped women joggers and beat them to death or into a coma. They dealt in crack cocaine. They were evil. They were crazy.

"I know that "them" is not a real group. I get that. I know that people are individuals. But still, deep down in here, down in places I try to hide, in places I don't like to go, I'm scared of them."

Bob stops and looks over at you.

"I'm scared of him, of my client, of Mr. Smith," Bob says. "I'll bet Mr. Smith isn't too happy to hear that, are you?"

"No, sir," you say, but you have a whole lot of other words on your mind. Your emotions cry out clearly through your tone and there is nervous laughter from the jury. The prosecutor starts to his feet again. Bob waves him down, as if to say he won't ask you any more questions. The prosecutor sits down, ready to object if he needs to.

"I'm scared, deep down in my heart, of black criminals, black men who deal drugs, who are in gangs. I'm scared of Mr. Smith. And, as his attorney, I'm scared some of you might feel that way, too. Does anyone feel like I do?"

Inside, you start to relax. You see where he's going. You see a few of the jurors nodding. Ms. D is almost in tears. Mr. A is leaning forward. They're getting ready to talk about this. You can tell. They're interested. You look over and see the frustrated face of the prosecutor. He realized too late where this was going.

The discussion proceeds and the jurors talk through the feelings of fear about people who are different. About black men in prison. About black drug dealers. Black street gangs and gang violence in prison. They start to help Bob feel better about the case. They start to suggest how a juror ought to act, what he ought to think about. They start to talk about you as a person, about how you could be different. They talk about how they feel.

Once they finish the racial topic, they move through some other discussions. The jury is wound up. They are talking. Sometimes, they are talking to each other. Sometimes, with Bob. And, they have all stopped raising their hands or looking scared. They've come together, just like Bob told you they would.

"If you trust them to," he said, "the jury will save you."

"The jury will give you justice."

____________________________________________________________________

We have to acknowledge what is already there. People are scared to talk about racism. It's politically incorrect. But, when I have a client who is a black man alleged to be a member of a gang, violent or a drug dealer, maybe even someone who has been in prison, it is imperative to get the jury talking about what lurks deep down inside of all of us: our fear of "them." 

Gang violence, drugs, guns, and all that are primarily associated with black men and Hispanic men. We are doing our client's a disservice when we ignore the obvious. Our juror's see this every day on television - whether it is in the news or a stereotypical character in a movie or TV drama.

In the end, if you get your jury to talk with you about it, they will begin to realize that they can see your client as a person, as a human being. They will talk about him individually and distinguish him from the group of "them" that scares all of us.

If you ignore this, you do so at the peril of your client. This is his only shot. How can you be sure he has a fair jury if you don't uncover this bit of poison. If you don't it can kill your case. You must extract it, isolate it, neutralize it. You must slice open that snake bite and suck that poison out. There are many ways to approach this, I've just walked through one. It works, but there are other ways. Find what works for you.

And, most of all - trust your jury to be people. Be your real feelings to them - trust them with that - trust them with you fears and concerns about the trial. They will trust you and they will talk with you about it - and, they will be their real feelings to you.  What more could you ask of any juror?

It is for good for your client to think about these things. It is important to the cause of justice. It is an imperative in order to obtain a fair trial. Your fears are the same ones the jurors will feel. Share with them and they will help you overcome them and show you how to deal with them.

Feel free to contact me to discuss this and other trial issues more.

Bob Vogel
Trial Attorney
Knoxville, TN
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
865-357-1949



Go Vols!

Just want to send out an encouraging word to the team - We are all behind you and know you can win. You guys have shown such great improvement already this year. You have a lot to be proud of.

Go Vols!

Bob Vogel
Class of 83

How 'bout them Vols!


Friday, November 1, 2013

Asset Forfeiture in Tennessee - What you need to know about how they can take your stuff?

Asset forfeiture is a big business in Tennessee.

by Bob Vogel, Attorney
The Vogel Law Firm
Knoxville, TN
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
865-357-4315


It's easy revenue for the county and the state. And, it's easy for them to do. All of the laws are set up to favor the State. There is no public trial. There is no public hearing. There is no jury. You have to hire your own lawyer. The State gets their own lawyer.

You then get to go to a hearing in some basement in some building that is not a courthouse. You talk to the State's attorney and the officer who took your stuff, like they'll ever say they were wrong. They want to make a deal with you. They want you to agree to let them keep your stuff. Or, they want you to agree to pay for it, or, if it's cash, split it with them. Bottom line, they want your stuff.

If you did this, by the way, you would go to jail for theft.

Or, you can have a hearing. An administrative law judge, not an elected one, but one appointed by the State, will hear your argument against the State. You have to prove that they don't have probable cause to keep your stuff. Otherwise, they keep your stuff.

Oh, and you have to post a $350 bond in order to even get a hearing. Unless you are indigent in which case they mostly don't believe you and make you post the bond, anyway. The same people who took your stuff get to decide if you have to post a bond.

Has this started to make you angry yet?

How can they do that? The legislature said they could.

Is it constitutional? I don't think so. I think it is a flaming violation of your rights under both the State and Federal Constitution. Unfortunately, so far, the Tennessee Supreme Court doesn't agree with me. You see, this action generally applies to people who society thinks of as criminals. So, it's okay to violate criminal's rights, isn't it? I believe it is a violation of your right to a trial and a violation of your due process rights.

Do you have to be convicted first? No. Surprisingly, simply being arrested or simply having an office believe there is probable cause you did something wrong can permit them to take your car.

So, how does it work?  They can take your car, your property and your money if you committing a crime or, if the police officer has probable cause to believe you are committing a crime.

What crimes?

Any of the following activities subject you to possible forfeiture of your car or other assets:

  1. Stuff you use to commit arson (burning down something you shouldn't burn down);
  2. Violation of someone's personal rights as regulated by trade practices (you put Smokey's picture on a bunch of T shirts and sell them without permission);
  3. Drugs - pretty much any crime related to drugs - possession, sale, delivery, manufacture - and that can be prescription drugs as well as meth;
  4. Driving after you lost your license for a DUI;
  5. they can take alcohol sold by an unlicensed dealer;
  6. they can take untaxed alcohol;
  7. they can take untaxed tobacco products;
  8. they can take your car and equipment for storing or transporting illegally captured game, specifically, bear and deer.
What is the procedure? If the seizing officer has probable cause to believe you used your car, for example, in the commission of a drug crime, then he can seize your car. Then, he has to take a warrant to a judge showing probable cause to seize your stuff. He has to provide an affidavit with the warrant. If the judge signs the warrant, then they have your stuff. They then tell you about a hearing. If you don't respond, they keep your stuff. If you go and lose, they keep your stuff. If you appeal and lose, they keep your stuff. See how it works, they keep your stuff.

What if I owe money on the car, or boat etc.? You still owe the money. The lender can make a claim against the asset, but if you don't and the lender doesn't, you still owe. You still have to make your payments. I had a client whose car was seized and he made payments for over a year before he got it back.

What can I do? Get a lawyer - they have one. If you want your asset back, then you have to either fight for it or buy it back.

What can I do to fix this horrible law? Write to your State representatives and get all of your friends and family to do it. Tell them you won't vote for them unless they fix this unconstitutional crap.



Here's some more information from the State website and from the code.

Contact me if you have questions or have had an asset seized by the State - don't take too long - time is your enemy here.

Bob Vogel
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
865-357-1949
www.robertvogellaw.com

Asset Forfeiture Division of the State of Tennessee

Asset Forfeiture Statute: T.C.A. 40-33-201 et seq.
Local agencies responsible for direct law enforcement seize property consisting of vehicles, money, real property, and other miscellaneous property. The agency then sends the paperwork to the Legal Division to process as jurisdiction has been given to the Commissioner of Safety for the disposition of this property.  Property may be seized for possession of narcotics, illegal or prescription.  Vehicles may be seized for driving on a driver’s license which has been revoked for driving under the influence and for driving under the influence for a second or subsequent time.  Both DUI charges must have occurred within five years of each other.
The Notice of Seizure and Forfeiture of Conveyances form is completed by the Officer at the time the property is seized.  He gives this to the person in possession of the property being seized as a receipt to show that the property is, in fact, being seized.  He is then responsible for taking this Notice of Seizure and a completed Forfeiture Warrant to a local Judge to show probable cause for the seizure.  If the Judge finds probable cause for the seizure, he signs the Warrant.
Once the Warrant is signed, the Notice of Seizure form and the signed Warrant are submitted to the Legal Division.  Notice that a Forfeiture Warrant has been signed is sent by certified mail to anyone reasonably located who may have an interest in this property.  They are responsible for filing a petition requesting a hearing within thirty (30) days of receiving the letter and signing the certified mail receipt.
Once a petition is filed, the case is set for hearing to determine the disposition of the property.  Notice of the hearing date is sent to all parties who have filed a petition about thirty (30) days before the hearing is set.  This hearing will be presided over by an Administrative Law Judge out of the Secretary of State Administrative Procedures Division.  The State has prosecuting attorneys for these hearings.  Claimants may hire their own defense attorney, at their expense, or may choose to represent themselves.
If a lien holder is listed on the title of a seized vehicle and a claim is filed by this lien holder only, there is not a hearing set.  The State’s Attorney will review the case and verify the lien.  An Order will be then be issued forfeiting the property to the seizing agency subject to the lien.  This allows the vehicle to be returned to the lien holder to satisfy the lien, or for the Agency which seized the vehicle to keep the vehicle and pay the lien holder their respective lien (being the lien at time of seizure less any payments made).
On the hearing date, the State’s Prosecuting Attorney and the Officer who seized the property will first try to negotiate an out of court settlement for the case with the claimants.  If no settlement can be reached or if all parties are not present, the case will be continued to a new hearing date, probably about three months in the future.  If a settlement is reached, the State’s Attorney will prepare a Proposed Civil Settlement Form.  The parties will all sign showing agreement with the settlement, and an Order will be prepared in accordance with the civil settlement agreement.
At a second date, if no settlement can be reached and all parties are present, the case will proceed to a hearing before the Administrative Law Judge.  The Judge will normally take a case under advisement and render his decision at a later date, usually in sixty (60) to ninety (90) days.  It is possible that a case may be continued for cause by agreement at any stage of the hearing; however, most continuances will require a motion to continue and a determination by the Administrative Law Judge.
The Judge’s ruling is normally for the property to be sold at public auction, put into service, or returned to the claimant.  Public auctions are the responsibility of the law enforcement agency that seized the vehicle.
If either party chooses to appeal an adverse decision of the Judge, they may do so by filing an initial appeal with the Commissioner of Safety in Nashville.
Further appeals may be had by moving the case into the Chancery Court of Davidson County, in Nashville, only.

40-33-201.  Application.
  All personal property, including conveyances, subject to forfeiture under § 39-14-307, § 47-25-1105, § 53-11-451, § 55-50-504(h), § 55-10-414, § 57-3-411, § 57-5-409, § 57-9-201, § 67-4-1020 or § 70-6-202, shall be seized and forfeited in accordance with the procedure set out in this part.

Warrant Requirement:

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-33-204  (2013)
First of 2 versions of this section

40-33-204.  Forfeiture warrant.  [Effective until January 1, 2014. See the version effective on January 1, 2014.]

  (a) Once personal property is seized pursuant to an applicable provision of law, no forfeiture action shall proceed unless a forfeiture warrant is issued in accordance with this section by a general sessions, circuit, criminal court or popularly elected city judge. The forfeiture warrant shall authorize the institution of a forfeiture proceeding under this part. As used in this subsection (a), "popularly elected city judge" means a licensed attorney who is elected to the office of city judge pursuant to title 16, chapter 18, part 2.

(b) The officer making the seizure shall apply for a forfeiture warrant by filing a sworn affidavit within five (5) working days following the property seizure. The forfeiture warrant shall be based upon proof by affidavit and shall have attached to it a copy of the notice of seizure. The hearing on the application for a forfeiture warrant shall be ex parte and shall be recorded. It is the duty of the court to maintain the recording. Certified copies of the proceeding shall be made available to any party requesting them, and the same shall be admissible as evidence. The affidavit in support of a forfeiture warrant shall be sworn to and state the following:

   (1) The legal and factual basis making the property subject to forfeiture;

   (2) If the owner or co-owner of the property was not the person in possession of the property at the time of seizure and can be determined from public records of titles, registrations or other recorded documents, the affidavit shall state with particular specificity the officer's probable cause for believing that the owner or co-owner of the property knew that the property was of a nature making its possession illegal or was being used in a manner making it subject to forfeiture as well as the legal, and factual basis for forfeiture of the interest; and

   (3) If the interest of a secured party with a duly perfected security interest as reflected in the public records of titles, registrations or other recorded documents, is sought to be forfeited, the affidavit shall state with particular specificity the officer's probable cause that the secured party's interest in the property is nevertheless subject to forfeiture as well as the legal and factual basis for forfeiture of the interest.

(c)  (1) The judge shall issue the forfeiture warrant if the judge finds that the offered proof establishes probable cause to believe that:

      (A) The property is subject to forfeiture; and

      (B) If the property is owned by one whose interest is described in public records of titles, registrations or other recorded documents, that the owner's interest is subject to forfeiture under the applicable provision of law.

   (2) If the seizing officer asserts to the judge that the officer was unable to determine the owner of the seized property or whether the owner's interest is subject to forfeiture within the required five-day period, the judge may grant up to ten (10) additional days to seek a forfeiture warrant if the judge finds that the seizing officer has:

      (A) Exercised due diligence and good faith in attempting to determine the owner of the property or whether the owner's interest is subject to forfeiture; and

      (B) Made a factual showing that because of the existence of extraordinary and unusual circumstances an exception to the five-day forfeiture warrant requirement is justified.

   (3) General sessions judges may authorize magistrates or judicial commissioners to issue forfeiture warrants. Prior to the authorization, the judges shall train and certify that the magistrates or judicial commissioners understand the procedure and requirements relative to the issuance of a forfeiture warrant.

(d) If the person in possession of the property is not the registered owner as determined from public records of titles, registrations or other recorded documents, the judge may consider other indicia of ownership that proves that the possessor is nonetheless an owner of the property. Other indicia of ownership shall include, but is not limited to, the following:

   (1) How the parties involved regarded ownership of the property in question;

   (2) The intentions of the parties relative to ownership of the property;

   (3) Who was responsible for originally purchasing the property;

   (4) Who pays any insurance, license or fees required to possess or operate the property;

   (5) Who maintains and repairs the property;

   (6) Who uses or operates the property;

   (7) Who has access to use of the property; and

   (8) Who acts as if they have a proprietary interest in the property.

(e) If the owner or co-owner of the property was not the person in possession of the property at the time of the seizure and can be determined from public records of titles, registrations or other recorded documents, the judge shall put the seizing officer under oath and ask the following questions:

   (1) What is the officer's probable cause that the owner or co-owner of the property knew that the property was of a nature making its possession illegal or was being used in a manner making it subject to forfeiture;

   (2) What is the officer's probable cause that the co-owner or co-owners who are not in possession of the property at the time it was seized were co-conspirators to the activity making the property subject to forfeiture; and

   (3) Any other questions necessary to determine the legal and factual basis for forfeiture.

(f) If a secured party's interest is sought to be forfeited, the judge shall put the seizing officer under oath and ask the following questions:

   (1) What is the officer's probable cause that the secured party is a co-conspirator to the activity making the property subject to forfeiture;

   (2) Did the secured party at the time the interest attached, have actual knowledge of the intended illegal use of the property; and

   (3) Any other question deemed necessary to determine the legal and factual basis for forfeiture of the secured party's interest.

(g) Upon issuance of the forfeiture warrant, the judge shall retain the affidavit relied upon in support of the warrant and the officer shall, within seven (7) working days, send the warrant, a copy of the affidavit and the notice of seizure to the applicable agency. By signing and issuing the forfeiture warrant, the judge is affirming that the required finding of probable cause necessary to issue the warrant has been made. Upon receipt of the documents, the applicable agency shall notify any other owner, as may be determined from public records of titles, registrations or other recorded documents, or secured party that a forfeiture warrant has been issued. Upon receipt of the notice of seizure and forfeiture warrant and after interviewing any witnesses, the applicable agency shall release the property if there is no legal and factual basis for forfeiture. The seizing agency shall maintain a copy of the notice of seizure for all property seized at its main office and the notices and receipts shall be public records.

(h) If no forfeiture warrant is issued, and the property is not needed for evidence in a criminal proceeding, the seizing agency shall immediately return the property to the owner, as determined from public records of titles, registrations or other recorded documents, or if the owner cannot be determined, to the person in possession of the property at the time of seizure.

(i) Upon the request of any general sessions, circuit, criminal court or popularly elected city judge, the administrative office of the courts shall provide a cassette tape recorder for the purpose of recording the hearing on the application for a forfeiture warrant. As used in this subsection (i), "popularly elected city judge" means a licensed attorney who is elected to the office of city judge pursuant to title 16, chapter 18, part 2.

Driving on suspended, revoked license due to DUI conviction

55-50-504(h)  (1) The vehicle used in the commission of a person's violation of § 55-50-504, when the original suspension or revocation was made for a violation of § 55-10-401, or a statute in another state prohibiting driving under the influence of an intoxicant, is subject to seizure and forfeiture in accordance with the procedure established in title 40, chapter 33, part 2. The department is designated as the applicable agency, as defined by § 40-33-202, for all forfeitures authorized by this subsection (h).

   (2) For purposes of clarifying this subsection (h) and consistent with the overall remedial purpose of the asset forfeiture procedure, a vehicle is subject to seizure and forfeiture upon the arrest or citation of a person for driving while the person's driving privileges are cancelled, suspended or revoked. A conviction for the criminal offense of driving while the person's driving privileges are cancelled, suspended or revoked is not required.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Tennessee its time to beat bama! Go Vols!

It's time. 'Bama has been a dominant force for far too long. Tennessee has always been there to challenge their dominance. We have the tradition. We have the pride. We have a great coach and a group of talented athletes. So, let's support this team. Go Vols!

After a hundred and ten years of history, the difference overall is only 11 games! That's a pretty close rivalry. Let's make it a difference of only 10 games today!

 
Bob Vogel
Class of '83
Go Vols!


Alabama victories are colored ██ crimson. Tennessee victories are colored ██ orange. Ties are white. Rankings are from the AP Poll
YearAlabamaTennesseeLocationSeries
1901Alabama6Tennessee6Birmingham, AL0–0–1
1903Alabama24Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA1–0–1
1904Alabama0Tennessee5Birmingham, AL1–1–1
1905Alabama29Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA2–1–1
1906Alabama51Tennessee0.Birmingham, ALALA3–1–1
1907Alabama5Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA4–1–1
1908Alabama4Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA5–1–1
1909Alabama10Tennessee0Knoxville, TNALA6–1–1
1912Alabama7Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA7–1–1
1913Alabama6Tennessee0Tuscaloosa, ALALA8–1–1
1914Alabama7Tennessee17Knoxville, TNALA8–2–1
1928Alabama13Tennessee15Tuscaloosa, ALALA8–3–1
1929Alabama0Tennessee6Knoxville, TNALA8–4–1
1930Alabama18Tennessee6Tuscaloosa, ALALA9–4–1
1931Alabama0Tennessee25Knoxville, TNALA9–5–1
1932Alabama3Tennessee7Birmingham, ALALA9–6–1
1933Alabama12Tennessee6Knoxville, TNALA10–6–1
1934Alabama13Tennessee6Birmingham, ALALA11–6–1
1935Alabama25Tennessee0Knoxville, TNALA12–6–1
1936Alabama0Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA12–6–2
1937Alabama14Tennessee7Knoxville, TNALA13–6–2
1938Alabama0Tennessee13Birmingham, ALALA13–7–2
1939#8 Alabama0#5 Tennessee21Knoxville, TNALA13–8–2
1940Alabama13#5 Tennessee27Birmingham, ALALA13–9–2
1941Alabama9Tennessee2Knoxville, TNALA14–9–2
1942#4 Alabama8#15 Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA15–9–2
1944Alabama0#17 Tennessee0Knoxville, TNALA15–9–3
1945#6 Alabama25Tennessee7Birmingham, ALALA16–9–3
1946#7 Alabama0#9 Tennessee12Knoxville, TNALA16–10–3
1947Alabama10Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA17–10–3
1948Alabama6Tennessee21Knoxville, TNALA17–11–3
1949Alabama7Tennessee7Birmingham, ALALA17–11–4
1950Alabama9#18 Tennessee14Knoxville, TNALA17–12–4
1951Alabama13#2 Tennessee27Birmingham, ALALA17–13–4
1952#18 Alabama0Tennessee15Knoxville, TNALA17–14–4
1953Alabama0Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA17–14–5
1954Alabama27Tennessee0Knoxville, TNALA18–14–5
1955Alabama0Tennessee20Birmingham, ALALA18–15–5
1956Alabama0#7 Tennessee24Knoxville, TNALA18–16–5
1957Alabama0Tennessee14Birmingham, ALALA18–17–5
1958Alabama7Tennessee14Knoxville, TN18–18–5
1959Alabama7#14 Tennessee7Birmingham, AL18–18–6
1960#15 Alabama7Tennessee20Knoxville, TNUT18–19–6
1961#5 Alabama34Tennessee3Birmingham, AL19–19–6
1962#2 Alabama27Tennessee7Knoxville, TNALA20–19–6
1963#9 Alabama35Tennessee0Birmingham, ALALA21–19–6
1964#3 Alabama19Tennessee8Knoxville, TNALA22–19–6
1965Alabama7Tennessee7Birmingham, ALALA22–19–7
1966#3 Alabama11Tennessee10Knoxville, TNALA23–19–7
1967#6 Alabama13#7 Tennessee24Birmingham, ALALA23–20–7
1968Alabama9#8 Tennessee10Knoxville, TNALA23–21–7
1969#20 Alabama14#13 Tennessee41Birmingham, ALALA23–22–7
1970Alabama0#14 Tennessee24Knoxville, TN23–23–7
1971#4 Alabama32#14 Tennessee15Birmingham, ALALA24–23–7
1972#3 Alabama17#10 Tennessee10Knoxville, TNALA25–23–7
1973#2 Alabama42#10 Tennessee21Birmingham, ALALA26–23–7
1974#4 Alabama28Tennessee6Knoxville, TNALA27–23–7
1975#6 Alabama30#16 Tennessee7Birmingham, ALALA28–23–7
1976#20 Alabama20Tennessee13Knoxville, TNALA29–23–7
1977#4 Alabama24Tennessee10Birmingham, ALALA30–23–7
1978#4 Alabama30Tennessee17Knoxville, TNALA31–23–7
1979#1 Alabama27#18 Tennessee17Birmingham, ALALA32–23–7
1980#1 Alabama27Tennessee0Knoxville, TNALA33–23–7
1981#15 Alabama38Tennessee19Birmingham, ALALA34–23–7
1982#2 Alabama28Tennessee35Knoxville, TNALA34–24–7
1983#11 Alabama34Tennessee41Birmingham, ALALA34–25–7
1984Alabama27Tennessee28Knoxville, TNALA34–26–7
1985#15 Alabama14#20 Tennessee16Birmingham, ALALA34–27–7
1986#2 Alabama56Tennessee28Knoxville, TNALA35–27–7
1987Alabama41#8 Tennessee22Birmingham, ALALA36–27–7
1988Alabama28Tennessee20Knoxville, TNALA37–27–7
1989#10 Alabama47#6 Tennessee30Birmingham, ALALA38–27–7
1990Alabama9#3 Tennessee6Knoxville, TNALA39–27–7
1991#14 Alabama24#8 Tennessee19Birmingham, ALALA40–27–7
1992#4 Alabama17#13 Tennessee10Knoxville, TNALA41–27–7
1993#2 Alabama17#10 Tennessee17Birmingham, ALALA41–28–7
1994#10 Alabama17Tennessee13Knoxville, TNALA42–28–7
1995#11 Alabama14#6 Tennessee41Birmingham, ALALA42–29–7
1996#7 Alabama13#6 Tennessee20Knoxville, TNALA42–30–7
1997Alabama21#9 Tennessee38Birmingham, ALALA42–31–7
1998Alabama18#3 Tennessee35Knoxville, TNALA42–32–7
1999#10 Alabama7#5 Tennessee21Tuscaloosa, ALALA42–33–7
2000Alabama10Tennessee20Knoxville, TNALA42–34–7
2001Alabama24#11 Tennessee35Tuscaloosa, ALALA42–35–7
2002#19 Alabama34#16 Tennessee14Knoxville, TNALA43–35–7
2003Alabama43#22 Tennessee51Tuscaloosa, ALALA43–36–7
2004Alabama13#11 Tennessee17Knoxville, TNALA43–37–7
2005#5 Alabama6#17 Tennessee3Tuscaloosa, ALALA43–37–7
2006Alabama13#7 Tennessee16Knoxville, TNALA43–38–7
2007Alabama41#20 Tennessee17Tuscaloosa, ALALA44–38–7
2008#2 Alabama29Tennessee9Knoxville, TNALA45–38–7
2009#1 Alabama12Tennessee10Tuscaloosa, ALALA46–38–7
2010#7 Alabama41Tennessee10Knoxville, TNALA47–38–7
2011#2 Alabama37Tennessee6Tuscaloosa, ALALA48–38–7
2012#1 Alabama44Tennessee13Knoxville, TNALA49–38–7
† Alabama would later forfeit the 1993 tie and vacate their 2005 win.
‡ Five overtime game.


 

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Emerson Air Comfort Products Recalls Tommy Bahama Outdoor Ceiling Fans Due to Risk of Injury

There have been incidents of the blades detaching and causing lacerations. My law firm helps people who are injured by a product or service. Please call Robert L. Vogel, The Vogel Law Firm, 865-357-1949  or write rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com for a free case evaluation. We are a consumer protection law firm.

Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.
Recall date: October 24, 2013
Recall number: 14-005                         
 
Emerson Air Comfort Tommy Bahama-brand Outdoor Ceiling Fan                           

Recall Summary

Name of product:
Tommy Bahama® Outdoor Ceiling Fans
Hazard:
The brackets holding the fan blades can break and cause the blades to fall, posing a risk of injury to bystanders.
Consumer Contact:
Emerson Air Comfort Products toll-free at (866) 994-8759 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. CT Monday through Friday, or online at www.emersonfans.com, then click on Recall Information for more information.
Report an Incident Involving this Product

Recall Details

Units
About 2,800 in the United States, 80 in Canada
Description

This recall involves Tommy Bahama brand 52-inch outdoor ceiling fans sold under the “The Copa Breeze” style name. The fan has model number TB311DBZ and a distressed bronze color. Each of the five oval-shaped paddles/blades has a metal accent in the shape of an oval with a figure-8 inside the oval.  The lower part of the motor housing has “Tommy Bahama” embossed on it.  A date code is represented by three letters printed on the lower right corner of a label on the top of the motor housing. Fans with one of the following three-letter combinations are included in the recall:
  
AJL, BAA, BAB, BAC, BAD, BAE, BAF,BAG, BAH, BAI, BAJ, BAK, BAL, BBA, BBB, BBC, BBD, BBE, BBF, BBG, BBH, BBI, BBJ, BBK, BBL, BCA, BCB, BCC and BCD
This recall involves Tommy Bahama brand 52-inch outdoor ceiling fans sold under the “The Copa Breeze” style name. The fan has model number TB311DBZ and a distressed bronze color. Each of the five oval-shaped paddles/blades has a metal accent in the shape of an oval with a figure-8 inside the oval.  The lower part of the motor housing has “Tommy Bahama” embossed on it.  A date code is represented by three letters printed on the lower right corner of a label on the top of the motor housing. Fans with one of the following three-letter combinations are included in the recall:  AJL, BAA, BAB, BAC, BAD, BAE, BAF,BAG, BAH, BAI, BAJ, BAK, BAL, BBA, BBB, BBC, BBD, BBE, BBF, BBG, BBH, BBI, BBJ, BBK, BBL, BCA, BCB, BCC and BCD
Incidents/Injuries
Emerson Air Comfort has received three reports of fan blades detaching, including one report of a laceration to a consumer who was hit in the back of the head by a falling blade.
Remedy
Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled fans and contact Emerson Air Comfort Products to schedule a free in-home repair or to order a free do-it-yourself repair kit.
Sold at
Fan and lighting stores nationwide and online at www.EmersonFans.com and Amazon.com from April 2010 through July 2012 for about $350.
Importer
Air Comfort Products, a division of Emerson Electric Co., of St. Louis, Mo
Manufactured in
China

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Child Custody Case



I think one of the hardest things to litigate is child custody. Assuming, that is, that you are willing to see both your client and the other parent as real people. It's easy to argue if you want to approach it as a winner take all type of litigation. But, child custody generally shouldn't be argued that way. Unless there is some clear reason that the other party is an unfit parent, then there is no basis for trying to cut them out of the child's life.

The problem is that each parent thinks they ought to be the one in charge of their child's life. Or, they feel that the other parent should not be. Sometimes this is because they harbor a long term resentment against them for the pain they suffered during the break up of their relationship. Sometimes, it is a selfish, me first, attitude - you know, like a toddler who can't share.

In either case, it is extremely difficult to sit down and negotiate a custody agreement that is friendly to both parents. Aside from any issues between them, there is the practical side. I was in a settlement conference today. We were talking about setting up 50/50 parenting time. But, then we looked at the logistics.

The mother works second shift, from 3 to 11. The child is 2. We don't want her boyfriend watching the baby, but, she doesn't want the baby at my client's house overnight. That feels too much like losing control for her. We can't meet at 11:30 at night to exchange the baby, so either the mother gets the baby and she is raised by the boyfriend, or the father gets the baby more than 50% of the time and becomes the  primary parent.

The mother is against this. She has one child that is already not in her custody. My sense of it is that she feels like giving up primary custody would be a sign of complete failure on her part. She would have to admit she can't be a good mother. No one wants to do that. So, she has to hold her ground. She can't compromise.

In the end, a situation like this will likely end up in Court, where a judge will decide who gets the child when, how and where. The problem is, the Judge doesn't have to live with his prescribed plan, the parents do. No one will be happy with the outcome of the hearing. And, it is probable that the mother will not get as much visitation from the Court as we are offering her.

But, the Court's focus will not be on the interests of either parent, but on the best interest of the child. The child will probably stay where she  is now. The mother may get a little more time, but she has a less reliable history of providing stability for the child. So, when push comes to shove, she will not end up with what she wants.

Yet, my heart goes out to her, because all she really wants is to have her child with her. The problem is, she wants the child even when she can't care for the child and she won't compromise with the father. And, to be fair, the father doesn't want to give up the control he has of the situation now.

One thing that we can't do is get people to think of others first. Yet, in a case like this, walking in the other guy's shoes and not putting your own needs first would go a long way to settling a dispute the way it ought to be settled, between the parents, without the outside influence, stress and pain of a court hearing.

You see, at court hearings, it is generally the worst thing about people that comes out, not the best. People testify about what is bad about the other person, not what is good. So, you can see that this type of  procedure is going to heat up the passions of the people involved, it is going to make them more angry with each other and create more of a gap between them. That is the wrong answer in most cases where children are involved.

Don't get me wrong. I'm all in favor of trials. I love trials. The hard fought battles are exhilarating and challenging. But, you also need to learn to pick your battles, as they say. So, unless there is some danger to the child, it is my opinion that you should go all out to reach an agreement about child custody rather than go through the pain and stress of a trial. You can do it, you just have to put yourself in the other guy's place for a little while.

That's just my thoughts and observations on it. I've had my share of custody fights and, while I can usually get the results my client and I determine are right and just, it is hard to do it without hurt feelings and residual anger. Ultimately, that is not a good result because, after the hearing, the father and mother still have to parent together for however many years it is until the child turns 18.

Something to think about.

Bob Vogel
Trial Attorney
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
865-357-1949

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Bullying Case Update on client who was beaten against a metal pole

Just completed the Complaint and filed a civil rights case about bullying and assault charges against a school system.
 
My client was beaten so badly that she had internal bleeding, her eye was displaced, she has lost some and may lose all the vision in it, her brain was bleeding - the school knew about the four girls who beat her - one already had assault charges on her, and they did nothing to protect the student body - and this is a small school - K-12, so the victim could have been anyone - it just happened to be my client
 
- they beat her against a metal pole for all the school to see - so they could see how tough they were, to let them all know what happens if you tell on someone - but, my client didn't actually do that - they made a mistake - a teacher walked by and didn't help,
 
finally, when they almost killed her - a teacher broke it up - but, the school didn't do anything for her - just let her sit in the office, bleed and vomit blood, almost pass out from her injuries - eye displaced due to the smashed orbital bone - when her mom came to get her she almost collapsed after seeing her injuries - the nurse had given her a bag of ice - simply refused medical treatment -
 
Mom took her to an ambulance substation - the ems workers took one look at her and called Lifestar to take her to UT Hospital - which saved her life. She was in critical care for 3 days.
 
When someone asked the nurse why she didn't call for an ambulance or do anything to help her she said "I didn't think it was that bad."
 
  I asked for $30 million dollars - $10 mil in compensatory and $20 million in punitive - and that is probably not enough.
 
I'll keep you posted as the case progresses. Keep me in your thoughts and prayers.
 
Bob Vogel
Trial Attorney
The Vogel Law Firm
865-357-4315
 

Monday, October 21, 2013

Watch Out for These Weight Loss Lies!

The big question is, of course: Will I Really Lose Weight?

Wouldn’t it be nice if you could lose weight simply by taking a pill, wearing a patch, or rubbing in a cream? Unfortunately, claims that you can lose weight without changing your habits just aren’t true.
Doctors, dieticians, and other experts agree that the best way to lose weight is to eat fewer calories and be more active. That's true even for people taking FDA-approved pills to help them lose weight. For most people, a reasonable goal is to lose about a pound a week, which means:
  • cutting about 500 calories a day from your diet
  • eating a variety of nutritious foods
  • exercising regularly
For more on healthy eating, visit Nutrition.gov, ChooseMyPlate.gov, or the Weight-control Information Network.

The following article first appeared on the FTC consumer information pages. I've tried different fads and diets over the years. There is a lot of wisdom in the information that follows. It is very important to get to and stay at a healthy weight. And there are many studies that prove that being healthy and getting regular exercise can stave off the aging process and dementia. Keeping your brain active is important to, and when you are physically active, your are more mentally active.

I hope this information helps you avoid some scams and traps and the you find the right plan for yourself.

If, after reading this article, you feel that you have been taken advantage of by a product or service - whether it is a diet or exercise product or program, call me. I handle all types of consumer protection and fraud cases.

Bob Vogel
Trial Attorney
The Vogel Law Firm
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
865-357-1949

The Truth Behind Weight Loss Ads

Claims to watch out for include:

Lose weight without diet or exercise!

Getting to a healthy weight takes work. Take a pass on any product that promises miraculous results without the effort. The only thing you’ll lose is money.

Lose weight no matter how much you eat of your favorite foods!

Beware of any product that claims that you can eat all the high-calorie food you want and still lose weight. Losing weight requires sensible food choices. Filling up on healthy vegetables and fruits can make it easier to say no to fattening sweets and snacks.

Lose weight permanently! Never diet again!

Even if you’re successful in taking weight off, permanent weight loss requires permanent lifestyle changes. Don’t trust any product that promises once-and-for-all results without ongoing maintenance.

Just take a pill!

Doctors, dieticians, and other experts agree that there’s simply no magic way to lose weight without diet or exercise. Even pills approved by FDA to block the absorption of fat or help you eat less and feel full are to be taken with a low-calorie, low-fat diet and regular exercise.

Lose 30 pounds in 30 days!

Losing weight at the rate of a pound or two a week is the most effective way to take it off and keep it off. At best, products promising lightning-fast weight loss are a scam. At worst, they can ruin your health.

Everybody will lose weight!

Your habits and health concerns are unique. There is no one-size-fits-all product guaranteed to work for everyone. Team up with your health care provider to design a nutrition and exercise program suited to your lifestyle and metabolism.

Lose weight with our miracle diet patch or cream!

You’ve seen the ads for diet patches or creams that claim to melt away the pounds. Don’t believe them. There’s nothing you can wear or apply to your skin that will cause you to lose weight.

Acai Berry Supplements in the “News”

More and more, scam artists are exploiting people’s trust in well-known news organizations by setting up fake news sites with the logos of legitimate news organizations to peddle their wares. In particular, sites claiming to be objective news sources may describe a so-called "investigation" of the effectiveness of acai berry dietary supplements for weight loss. These sites are a marketing ploy created to sell acai berry supplements.

Tainted Weight Loss Products

In the last few years, FDA has discovered hundreds of dietary supplements containing drugs or other chemicals, often in products for weight loss and bodybuilding. These extras generally aren't listed on the label — and might even be sold with false and misleading claims like “100% natural” and “safe.” They could cause serious side effects or interact in dangerous ways with medicines or other supplements you're taking.

The Skinny on Electronic Muscle Stimulators

You might have seen ads for electronic muscle stimulators claiming they will tone, firm, and strengthen abdominal muscles, help you lose weight, or get rock hard abs. But according to FDA, while these devices may temporarily strengthen, tone, or firm a muscle, no electronic muscle stimulator device alone will give you “six-pack” abs.

Where to Complain

Report fraudulent weight loss product claims to the FTC. You also can contact your state Attorney General

Feel free to contact me with questions or concerns. Bob Vogel - rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com

The Perfect Client for a Trial Attorney

Who is the perfect client?

Would he or she be like me? Are they rich or poor? Are they college grads or do they have GED's? What do they do for a living? Are they from an ethnic group different than mine? Are they male or female? Are they old or young? Are they sick or injured or healthy? Do they have a pet? kids? divorced or married? Where do they live?

Do the answers to any of these questions matter?

An affirmative YES! and, then, a resounding No! The answers matter, but not in the way you think. They matter after the attorney-client relationship has begun, not before. They matter when I am crafting the complaint or the defense. They matter when I draft or respond to discovery requests. They matter when I present your story to the jury.

What matters most is that the client has a story to tell.

If the client is injured, physically or financially, then I need to know who is the villain of the story -- is it a person, corporation, employer, police officer, jailer, or government that has injured the client through neglect or because they intended to? Who did it? I need to know if someone ran into him, or if a cop beat him during an arrest, or if he was ripped off by a business, or had his rights violated.

If the client has been arrested, then I need to know that the story demonstrates that the police or the prosecutor has violated my client's rights, or that my client affirms his innocence, or that he may be guilty of a crime, but not one as serious as the crime he is charged with. If he is appealing his case, then the story must talk about mistakes the judge made, or the prosecutor, or his trial attorney.

And, the stories must also talk about the client. Who she is. Where she is from. How things got to the way they are today. Why did it happen? The jury cares about these things. And, that is who we, my clients and I, care about.

So, the perfect client is a client who has a story to tell. And that story exists and can come to life for everyone who has been injured, neglected, abused, ripped off, falsely accused, bullied, discriminated against, or falsely imprisoned (to mention just a few). We are all unique. We all have a story. That story can be told in a way that compels people to listen. That story can be told in a way that demands justice. The perfect client's story can be told in a way that makes people care - makes the jury care!

My job is to tell that story. My job is to make sure that the jury sees you. That they feel your pain,  your outrage, your emotional distress, your fear, your hopelessness, your physical restrictions, your broken heart, your anger at being charged falsely, your panic about spending time in jail, your injured child or wife or husband, your depression because of your injury or because your rights were violated and you were abused. They must understand the bills that are piling up. They must see how this is affecting those you love and who love you.

I have to reach down inside of me and find the power to show them you - the perfect client. I will and do, all the time, show the jury how they can be the heroes in your life. They can save you. In fact, in most cases, the jury is your best and most powerful ally. If we can show them your story, honestly, openly and let them feel it with you, let them experience it with you, they will come along beside you and help you. You can trust them. I have seen it.

The perfect client is the client who gives me the gift of telling his story to the jury.

I hope that is you.

All the best,

Bob Vogel
Trial Attorney
The Vogel Law Firm
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
865-357-1949

Sunday, October 20, 2013

How to Avoid Tech Support Scams

The following article is reprinted from the Consumer Protection Website. I hope that this helps you avoid scams and con artists. It is frightening the number of people out there trying to exploit you on the internet. Take the advise from this article and make your time a little safer on the internet and avoid losing your money to any of these scams.

I hope this helps,

Bob Vogel
The Vogel Law Firm
865-357-1949
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
www.robertvogellaw.com

 How Tech Support Scams Work

Scammers have been peddling bogus security software for years. They set up fake websites, offer free “security” scans, and send alarming messages to try to convince you that your computer is infected. Then, they try to sell you software to fix the problem. At best, the software is worthless or available elsewhere for free. At worst, it could be malware — software designed to give criminals access to your computer and your personal information.
The latest version of the scam begins with a phone call. Scammers can get your name and other basic information from public directories. They might even guess what computer software you’re using.
Once they have you on the phone, they often try to gain your trust by pretending to be associated with well-known companies or confusing you with a barrage of technical terms. They may ask you to go to your computer and perform a series of complex tasks. Sometimes, they target legitimate computer files and claim that they are viruses. Their tactics are designed to scare you into believing they can help fix your “problem.”
Once they’ve gained your trust, they may:
  • ask you to give them remote access to your computer and then make changes to your settings that could leave your computer vulnerable
  • try to enroll you in a worthless computer maintenance or warranty program
  • ask for credit card information so they can bill you for phony services — or services you could get elsewhere for free
  • trick you into installing malware that could steal sensitive data, like user names and passwords
  • direct you to websites and ask you to enter your credit card number and other personal information
Regardless of the tactics they use, they have one purpose: to make money.

If You Get a Call

If you get a call from someone who claims to be a tech support person, hang up and call the company yourself on a phone number you know to be genuine. A caller who creates a sense of urgency or uses high-pressure tactics is probably a scam artist.
Keep these other tips in mind:
  • Don’t give control of your computer to a third party who calls you out of the blue.
  • Do not rely on caller ID alone to authenticate a caller. Criminals spoof caller ID numbers. They may appear to be calling from a legitimate company or a local number, when they’re not even in the same country as you.
  • Online search results might not be the best way to find technical support or get a company’s contact information. Scammers sometimes place online ads to convince you to call them. They pay to boost their ranking in search results so their websites and phone numbers appear above those of legitimate companies. If you want tech support, look for a company’s contact information on their software package or on your receipt.
  • Never provide your credit card or financial information to someone who calls and claims to be from tech support.
  • If a caller pressures you to buy a computer security product or says there is a subscription fee associated with the call, hang up. If you’re concerned about your computer, call your security software company directly and ask for help.
  • Never give your password on the phone. No legitimate organization calls you and asks for your password.
  • Put your phone number on the National Do Not Call Registry, and then report illegal sales calls.

If You’ve Responded to a Scam

If you think you might have downloaded malware from a scam site or allowed a cybercriminal to access your computer, don’t panic. Instead:
  • Get rid of malware. Update or download legitimate security software and scan your computer. Delete anything it identifies as a problem. 
  • Change any passwords that you gave out. If you use these passwords for other accounts, change those accounts, too.
  • If you paid for bogus services with a credit card, call your credit card provider and ask to reverse the charges. Check your statements for any other charges you didn’t make, and ask to reverse those, too.
  • If you believe that someone may have accessed your personal or financial information, visit the FTC’s identity theft website. You can minimize your risk of further damage and repair any problems already in place.
  • File a complaint with the FTC at ftc.gov/complaint.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Another Rape Coverup? Ask Daisy Coleman

by Attorney Bob Vogel
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com

What do you do when you are 14 and raped by an older boy? What do you do when you are drugged, beaten, molested and dumped in the snow to live or die on your own after you are used by teen age boys you thought were your friends? You go to the hospital. You go to the police. You ask for help.

You get a rape kit done and it comes back positive. The boy gets arrested. He goes to jail. He confesses. Justice. Right?

Not so fast. If you are a teenage girl in Maryville, you may end up with a different result. You may find that the charges are dropped. You may find that he turns the tables on you. You may find yourself labeled a "skank" or worse. You may find that his family is influential and can get the prosecutor to drop the charges. You may find out that you are the butt of jokes. You may find out that you are now going to be bullied, and your family is going to be bullied. Because, you were asking for it, right?

Wrong. You were drugged. You were raped. It was videoed. Your 13 year old friend was raped, too. And, now, the people you trusted have turned on you. The police aren't helping. The prosecutors have caved into political pressure. After all, he has to get re-elected, doesn't he? Most likely, the judge does, too, as well as the county sheriff.

So, in the back rooms, in hushed discussions, in passing conversations in the hallways of the buildings where you should find justice, you are betrayed: your reputation is sold, your life is sold, your pain and anguish and despair and depression are sold for votes, for a career, for a political favor. You become a dirty joke. You have now been raped, again.

Is this justice? Is this what you hope to find when you lay your life down on the courthouse steeps? Do you expect to be victimized, again?

Daisy Coleman and her family need us to speak out. We need to be outraged at this miscarriage of justice. We need to stand up and say that we will not let this happen to Daisy or any other girl. It is not okay. We demand that the police and the prosecutor do the right thing. If they do not, then we will hold them accountable.

Remember, we always have the right to go after them legally. We can take them to court, sue them and put them in front of twelve honest citizens who will hear all the facts and decide justice. All of us have that right. Certainly, Daisy does. She deserves it, just like you or I do.

I know that, given the opportunity, I would fight for Daisy and her family in court. I would willingly take on this power structure that has denied her justice. I would love to stand against these bullies and to confront her rapist and his family, and the family of all of the boys who were there and either participated, helped or just let it happen and laughed. At the boys and their families who thought it was alright to use her for their pleasure and then discard her like garbage in the snow.

These are sad, pathetic, despicable human beings, and they must be held accountable. Let us all help Daisy find justice.

I look forward to your comments.

Bob Vogel
The Vogel Law Firm
Knoxville, TN
rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
865-357-1949

Read this excellent and well researched article about the case:

http://www.kansascity.com/2013/10/12/4549775/nightmare-in-maryville-teens-sexual.html

 


The “Justice For Daisy” Movement Has Begun

Between Anonymous hackers and local activists, Maryville is poised to follow Steubenville as the next small-town home of a major teenage rape case. posted on
The "Justice For Daisy" Movement Has Begun
Jessica Testa
Daisy Coleman with her brothers. facebook.com
It didn’t take long for the internet to declare war against the city of Maryville, Missouri. On Saturday, the Kansas City Star published a long, revealing look at one mother’s claim that her 14-year-old daughter, Daisy Coleman, was raped, and that backlash over their pursuit of charges against a 17-year-old football player drove their family from the small Missouri city.