Sunday, January 20, 2013

If an Employee is Injured at work employers must report immediately

WHEN AN EMPLOYEE IS INJURED, THE EMPLOYER HAS SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES:
Employers covered by the Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Act must submit all known or reported injuries or illnesses to their insurance carriers on Tennessee Employer’s First Report of Work Injury or Illness (Form C-20) within one (1) working day of knowledge of the injury or illness. Insurance carriers and self-insured employers must file the Form C-20 with the Division through Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) as soon as possible, but not later than fourteen (14) days after knowledge of the injury or illness. A workplace injury or illness that causes an employee to receive medical treatment outside of the employer’s premises, their death, their absence from work, or their retention of a permanent impairment must be reported.  The claim must be reported to the insurer even if the employer feels the claim is not work-related. The insurance carrier can investigate and deny the claim if appropriate.

 
If you have been injured at work, we can help. We actively assist our clients with their claims and make sure they get the best settlement offer for their injury. We are also aggressive trial attorneys and will fight for you if your employer or their insurance company refused to provide reasonable compensation for your injury. We care about our clients and want to help you make sure you and your family is taken care of if you have been injured. Contact The Vogel Law Firm or email Attorney Robert L. Vogel at rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com for a free consultation or call us at 865-357-1949.
 
After the injury is reported, then the employer must do the following: 
  1. Provide the injured employee a panel of at least three physicians on Agreement Between Employer/Employee Choice of Physician Form (Form C-42). If the injury is to the back, the panel must include a chiropractor. If specialized treatment is required, the authorized treating physician may refer the employee for such specialized treatment at which time another panel of specialized physicians should be offered. The named-providers should be located in or near the employee's community of residence. The employee has the privilege of choosing one physician from the list. This selected physician becomes the “treating physician.” A Form C-42 designating the chosen physician and signed by the employee is the employer's proof that the employee was offered a choice of physicians. A copy of this completed form must be provided to the employee. The employer must keep the original form on file and provide a copy to the Division of Workers' Compensation upon request.
     
    If the employer does not have a panel of physicians, it should call its insurer and develop one. The employer should post the panel of physicians in a conspicuous place for employees to review.
     
     
  2. Have the injured employee sign a Medical Waiver and Consent Form (Form C-31). This form allows the employer, insurance carrier, third party administrator, case manager, utilization review agent and Division to communicate with the treating physician about the treatment for the injury.
     
     
  3. Inform the employee of the name and telephone number of the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier/adjuster.
     
     
  4. Submit a statement of the employee's wages to their workers’ compensation insurer. The statement should show the gross wages earned by the injured employee each week for the fifty-two (52) weeks prior to the injury. If the injured employee was employed less than 52 weeks, the statement should show all of the weeks worked and gross wages earned each week, including overtime, bonuses, etc.

 If you have been injured at work, we can help. We actively assist our clients with their claims and make sure they get the best settlement offer for their injury. We are also aggressive trial attorneys and will fight for you if your employer or their insurance company refused to provide reasonable compensation for your injury. We care about our clients and want to help you make sure you and your family is taken care of if you have been injured. Contact The Vogel Law Firm or email Attorney Robert L. Vogel at rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com for a free consultation or call us at 865-357-1949. 

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

When the Boss Is a Bully

When the Boss is the Bully....

 

I believe this is a good article with good intentions. However, when I read through the suggestions, I found that they are a little old school. For example, the first suggestion on curing the problem is to confront the bully. This is seldom an option for victims of bullying because you don't feel you have the power to confront the bully. When the bully has all the power, you fear for your job.

We have had several situations like that in the last year. That is why an intellegent application of your rights and bringing in outside authority can be helpful. A court action brings in the authority of the judge. The bully has no power over the judge. There are laws that prevent retaliation. And, the bully cannot control them.

I think that you really need to consider all of your options when you are in this type of difficult situation. I was in one a few years back. The bully was a regional manager with about 30 managers reporting to him. He bullied everyone. If you wouldn't knuckle under, you were gone. I was there on a training assignment. After six months, I had to give up. He had been rewarded too much for his behavior to change it. He couldn't if he tried. I saw him bully his own son, one day. I ended up finding another position and left. The only people that stayed with him were people who could live with that kind of abuse and accept it. I could not.

Contact me if you have been the victim of bullying at school or the workplace - Attorney Bob Vogel -865-357-1949 or email me at rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com


Here's that article from Psychology Today....
    
They verbally abuse you, humiliate you in front of others. Maybe it's because power hovers in the air, but offices tend to bring out the bully in people. We offer strategies for handling such bad bosses.
If the schoolyard is the stomping ground of bully boys and bully girls, then the office is the playground of adult bullies. Perhaps because power is the chief perk in most companies, especially those with tight hierarchies, offices can bring out the bully in people.
Everyone has a war story. There's the boss who calls at 2 A.M. from Paris--just because he's there. The boss who asks for your evaluation of a problem and then proceeds to denigrate you and your opinion in front of the whole staff as you seethe with hopefully hidden rage. "It's a demonstration of power. It's demeaning," contends Harry Levinson, Ph.D., the dean of organizational psychologists and head of the Levinson Institute in Waltham, Massachusetts.
"I haven't studied office bullying systematically," he says. In fact, no one has. Despite common perceptions of its prevalence, it's essentially virgin turf for organizational psychology. Trouble is, organizational psychologists are often called in at the highest level of management; nowadays, most bullies are weeded out before they get to the top.
Nevertheless, says Levinson, 40 years of consulting have given him some idea of what they do and why. They over-control, micromanage, and display contempt for others, usually by repeated verbal abuse and sheer exploitation. They constantly put others down with snide remarks or harsh, repetitive, and unfair criticism. They don't just differ with you, they differ with you contemptuously; they question your adequacy and your commitment. They humiliate you in front of others.
There are two kinds of bullies, observes organizational psychologist Laurence Stybel, Ph.D., a principal of Boston's Stybel Peabody Lincolnshire & Associates: "Successful ones and unsuccessful ones. The latter don't last long in organizations. The successful bullies create problems, but they are competent"
Often they are very bright workers. And therein lies the problem. They make a significant contribution to the company as workers. They get promoted because of their technical expertise. Then they wind up supervising others, and spew on people in support functions, on competitors, perhaps even their own bosses.
They are especially rampant in high-tech companies, engineering firms, and financial organizations--a stock fund manager doing an incredible job with investments, for example. "The typical successful bully thinks, 'They won't do anything to me--I'm the best they've got,"'Stybel says. But sooner or later, it's too costly to tolerate their behavior.
It's getting too costly much sooner in most companies. Stybel cites the example of a large New England hospital where the bully is a brilliant physician who has been the director of radiology for 11 years. The bullying was an issue over the years--in the exit interviews of departing technical staff.
Why did the hospital decide to do something only now? The administrator told Stybel: "We can't tolerate the high turnover anymore. It's too costly in the face of managed care."
Occasionally, bullies do get to the very top. Levinson points to Harold Geneen, the legendary head of ITT, and coach Vince Lombardi. And then there's the issue of Fortune magazine devoted every couple of years to America's "toughest" bosses. Take the female CEO who reportedly yelled at the executives of a division she felt was underperforming: "You're eunuchs! How can your wives stand you? You've got nothing between your legs!"
At least in large corporations, bullying is not as blatant as it once was. "The John Wayne image of a leader doesn't go over so well in the '90s" notes Pat Alexander of the Center for Creative Leadership in Greensboro, North Carolina. "It affects the efficiency of the entire organization." Intimidation tends to be more polished.
While it's no longer cool to throw around your authority, counterforces are leading to greater tolerance of negative behavior. Stybel points to a growing 'What can you do for me now?' stance. "There's a new generation of CEOs who expect to be in place four years and move on. This fosters emotional distancing from employees, an excessive focus on transactions; it does not foster a positive relationship mode. Companies are growing increasingly performance-oriented; do they care how anyone feels about an executive's behavior?
"Where I have been retained, it's not because they don't like bullies" notes Stybel. "Only the underlying economics make it a dysfunctional behavior."
While bullies inhabit the middle ranks of large concerns, they are positively thriving at small companies. "There are lots of bad bosses out there,' says Atlanta-based management consultant Neil Lewis, Ph.D. "In smaller companies the quality of management is not as good as at large companies. They're not professional managers."
Stybel warns workers not to focus on where bullying comes from. "When observers see a boss behave as a bully, they attribute it to trait characteristics. That may not be the case. It's almost always a product of individual history and make-up--and the company atmosphere. But who cares? The most important thing is the behavior."
Bullies do a lot of damage in organizations. They make subordinates run scared. They put people in a protective mode, which interferes with the company's ability to generate innovation. They don't build in perpetuation of the organization, says Levinson. "It keeps you in a state of psychological emergency. And add to it the rage you feel towards the bully and a sense of self-rage for putting up with such behavior." These are hardly prime conditions for doing your best work--any work.

As with kids, bully bosses have blind spots. They don't see themselves accurately. They see themselves as better than others--which only acts to justify their bullying behavior--a feeling reinforced by promotion. Another big blind spot: sensitivity to others' feelings. Often, says Levinson, this arises in competitive settings, where "you learn to focus on your own behavior. It breeds a kind of psychological ignorance."
Stybel has developed a psychological karate chop to "unfreeze" executives's attitudes--a customized letter of probation. It essentially tells an executive that, due to changes in market conditions, or some other external factor, his weaknesses now outweigh the strengths he has long displayed. "It spells out desired behavioral changes in a positive way--not 'people are complaining that you are a bully' but 'if you make these changes you'll have a reputation as someone who is considerate.'" It gives honchos 90 days to shape up--or else.
It's never easy to make headway with an office bully, observers agree. The first step is to recognize when it's happening. Repetitive verbal abuse. Micromanagement. Exploitation. Any activity that repeatedly demeans you or is discourteous. "Whenever you're dissed, you're dealing with a bully," says Levinson. "Sometimes it's inadvertent. We all get caught up in that--once. You apologize and it's over. But bullies don't recognize their impoliteness and they don't apologize."

Tactics from the Pros

Here are tactics from seasoned organizational consultants:

o Confront the bully: "I'm sorry you feel you have to do that, but I will not put up with that kind of behavior. It has no place here." It can be startlingly effective. "Bullies lack boundaries on their own behavior. Some external controls may force them to back off" says Levinson. "A bully can't bully if you don't let yourself be bullied."
o Conduct the confrontation in private--behind dosed doors in the bully's office, at lunch outside the office. The bully won't back down in front of an audience.
o Specify the behavior that's unworkable: "You can't just fire from the hip and demean me in front of my staff or others."
o Don't play armchair psychologist. Restrict the discussion to specific behaviors, not theories of motivation.
o Make your boss aware by showing him or her the consequences of his behavior on others. "I've been noticing how Jim seems so demoralized lately. I think one of the contributing factors may be last week's meeting when you ridiculed him for producing an inadequate sales report." Many executives have no information on how their leadership style impacts others, says Alexander. "Peers don't tell them they are in competition. Why feed information that may make your competitor more effective?"
o Awareness is not enough; help your boss figure out what to do. Specify the behavioral change you want. "Your boss is likely to brush off criticism with, 'That's just my style,'" observes Marquand. "Furnish your boss with an example of desirable behavior-from his or her own repertoire of actions. Jump in with 'But I can recall a month ago when you were . . . lavish in your praise of that new assistant,' or whatever."
o Point out how the boss's behavior is seen by others. "You embarrass me when you publicly humiliate me in a meeting, but you also embarrass yourself. You're demonstrating your weakness." Comparing self-perceptions and the perceptions of others is often a "grabber," finds Alexander. "The fact of difference gets people's attention."
o Try humor. If you point out to your boss that she's acting like a caricature, that may be enough to make her aware.
o Recruit an ally or allies. Standing up for yourself can stop a bully by earning his/her respect. But it could also cost your job. The higher your boss is in the organization, says Lewis, the more you need allies. "It pays to check out with other workers whether the behavior you are experiencing is generalized or idiosyncratic," says Levinson. "If it's generalized, it's easier for two or three people to confront a boss than one alone."
o If the company you work for is large enough to have one, talk to the human resources department. Unfortunately, says Levinson, companies often don't learn about bullying experiences until an exit interview. But the larger the company you work for, the more mechanisms there are in place to deal with bullies. Unfortunately, the corollary is that in a smaller organization you may have little choice except to leave.
o If you are important to the organization, you may accomplish your goal by going to your boss's boss. But that's always a chancy move; you'll have to live with your boss in the morning.
PHOTO (BLACK & WHITE): The boss is the bully.

Bullying - Serious Problem

 

Here is an excerpt from an excellent article on bullying put out by the National Crime Prevention Commission. I sure wish everyone took this crime as seriously....

Bullying


Information and Resources To Help Prevent the Serious Problem of Bullying

Bullying has become a tidal wave of epic proportions. Although bullying was once considered a rite of passage, parents, educators, and community leaders now see bullying as a devastating form of abuse that can have long-term effects on youthful victims, robbing them of self-esteem, isolating them from their peers, causing them to drop out of school, and even prompting health problems and suicide.
A recent study by the Family and Work Institute reported that one-third of youth are bullied at least once a month, while others say six out of 10 American teens witness bullying at least once a day. Witnessing bullying can be harmful, too, as it may make the witness feel helpless - or that he or she is the next target.
Children who are bullied are often singled out because of a perceived difference between them and others, whether because of appearance (size, weight, or clothes), intellect, or, increasingly, ethnic or religious affiliation and sexual orientation.
And bullying can be a gateway behavior, teaching the perpetrator that threats and aggression are acceptable even in adulthood. In one study by Fight Crime: Invest in Kids, nearly 60 percent of boys whom researchers classified as bullies in grades six to nine were convicted of at least one crime by the age of 24, while 40 percent had three or more convictions.
 
 

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Questions and Answers on Fungal Meningitis Outbreak

If you or anyone you know has been injured by this faulty drug, or any other faulty drug, contact the Vogel Law Firm right away by calling 865-357-1949 or email Attorney Robert Vogel at rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com for a free consultation and to find out how you can protect your rights and recover damages.
 
Q1. What is FDA’s role in the investigation?

A1. FDA was been working closely with CDC, several state health departments, and the Massachusetts Board of Pharmacy to investigate the scope and cause of the outbreak of fungal meningitis. FDA inspectors in the New England District Office, in cooperation with the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Pharmacy, have been conducting an inspection of the New England Compounding Center. FDA has confirmed the presence of a fungal contaminant in multiple sealed vials of methylprednisolone acetate collected from NECC, and is in the process of conducting additional testing to confirm the species of the fungus.

Q2. Is New England Compounding Center still producing sterile injectable products?

A2. No. The firm voluntarily ceased all operations and surrendered its license to the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Pharmacy on October 3, 2012. NECC has also announced a voluntary recall of all of their products.

Q3. What should health care providers do to protect their patients from the threat of potential contamination?

A3. Although the investigation into the source of the outbreak is still ongoing, if you have purchased a product from NECC, we are advising you not to use it at this time. Please see the CDC website2 for additional information. See Q9 regarding advice to health care providers related to the additional injectable products, including an ophthalmic drug that is injectable or used in conjunction with eye surgery, or a cardioplegic solution purchased from or produced by NECC.

Q4. Are there other FDA approved epidural steroid injections that can be used?

A4. There are FDA approved versions of methylprednisolone acetate injection on the market, available with or without preservatives. The FDA-approved products are not approved for epidural administration.

Q5. Does FDA anticipate a shortage of epidural steroid injection drug supply?

A5. No. FDA’s drug shortage office has confirmed that NECC’s voluntary shutdown will not affect the nationwide supply of methylprednisolone acetate.

Additional Patient Notification Advisory


Q6. What led FDA to take this action?

A6: As a result of FDA, CDC, and state health departments’ ongoing investigation of contamination at the New England Compounding Center’s (NECC) Framingham, Massachusetts facility, we have learned that two patients may have infections associated with other possibly contaminated NECC products. While the investigation of these patients is ongoing, and there may be other explanations for their infections, out of an abundance of caution, we are issuing new guidance for providers to contact their patients for whom they administered an injectable product, including an ophthalmic drug that is injectable or used in conjunction with eye surgery, or a cardioplegic solution purchased from or produced by NECC after May 21, 2012.

With regard to the two patients who are being evaluated, we can provide the following information. One patient, identified through active surveillance, is under investigation for possible meningitis potentially associated with epidural injection of an additional NECC product, triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide is a type of steroid injectable product made by NECC. FDA-approved triamcinolone acetonide is approved for intra-articular (within a joint) or soft tissue injection. The cases of meningitis identified to date have all been associated with methylprednisolone acetate, another similar steroid injectable product.

In addition, one heart transplant patient with Aspergillus fumigatus infection who was administered NECC cardioplegic solution during surgery hase been reported. Investigation of these patients is ongoing, and, there may be other explanations for their Aspergillus infection. Cardioplegic solution is used to induce cardiac muscle paralysis during open heart surgery to prevent injury to the heart.

At this time, no patients are under investigation in connection with any NECC-produced ophthalmic drug that is injectable or used in conjunction with eye surgery, but FDA believes this class of products could present potentially similar risks of infection because of concerns about sterility.

Q7: Does FDA believe these products are contaminated with the same fungus as the methylprednisolone acetate?

A7: At this point in the investigation, FDA analysis of triamcinolone acetonide collected from the health care facility that reported the new meningitis case is being cultured, and we will release results when available.

Q8: Does FDA believe all products compounded by NECC are at risk?

8A: The investigation is ongoing. On October 4, we urged providers not to use any products made at NECC. At this point in FDA’s investigation, the sterility of any injectable drugs, including ophthalmic drugs that are injectable or used in conjunction with eye surgery, and cardioplegic solutions produced by NECC are of significant concern.

Q9: What should HCPs and patients do who were given these products?

A9: The FDA has previously issued guidance for medical professionals that all products distributed by NECC should be retained, secured, and withheld from use. NECC has voluntarily recalled all products that it has distributed. Based on new information, FDA advises that if, after May 21, 2012, a health care professional administered to a patient an injectable product, including an ophthalmic drug that is injectable or used in conjunction with eye surgery, or a cardioplegic solution purchased from or produced by NECC, the healthcare professional should follow up with those patients and make sure the patients are aware of the signs and symptoms of infection and instruct them to contact their health care provider immediately if they have any of these symptoms. Products from NECC can be identified by markings that indicate New England Compounding Center by name or by its acronym (NECC), and/or the company logo that can be accessed here3.

At this time, FDA is not advising health care professionals to contact patients who have been administered lower risk NECC products such as topicals (for example, lotions, creams, eyedrops not used in conjunction with surgery) and suppositories.

Patients who believe they received an injection or other product compounded by NECC after May 21, 2012 should remain vigilant for the signs and symptoms of infection, including meningitis. The signs and symptoms of meningitis include fever, headache, stiff neck, nausea and vomiting, photophobia (sensitivity to light) and altered mental status. Symptoms for other possible infections may include fever; swelling, increasing pain, redness, warmth at injection site; visual changes, pain, redness or discharge from the eye; chest pain, or drainage from the surgical site (infection within the chest). Patients should contact their healthcare provider if they have any of these signs or symptoms.

Q10: FDA is advising doctors to contact any of the patients to whom they have administered an NECC injectable drug, including ophthalmic products or cardioplegic solutions, after May 21, 2012. How many products does that encompass?

A10: NECC has provided a list of products that they have produced and distributed, which can be found and accessed here [HTML4 | PDF5]. There are about 1200 products on that list. A large percentage of these products are injectables, including ophthalmic products that are injectable or used in conjunction with eye surgery and cardioplegic solutions. FDA is working with NECC to produce a specific list of injectables, including ophthalmic products and cardioplegic solutions, and will post that as soon as possible.

Q11: What steps should health care professionals take to communicate with patients?

A11: FDA recognizes that some health care professionals may receive a high volume of calls from patients or be concerned about having to notify many patients as a result of FDA’s recommendation. FDA defers to the clinical judgment of healthcare professionals to decide the appropriate communications mode, whether it is email, phone (including voicemails), letter, or otherwise. Face-to-face communication with patients is not necessary to notify patients.

Q12: Are the FDA-approved versions of triamcinolone acetonide contraindicated for epidural administration?

A12: FDA-approved triamcinolone acetonide is approved for intra-articular (within a joint) or soft tissue injection. The FDA-approved triamcinolone acetonide is not approved for spinal injections.

Q13: What should patients do if they are diagnosed with meningitis or joint infections associated with the use of contaminated NECC products?

A13: Patients who have been diagnosed with meningitis or joint infections should consult with their healthcare providers about the appropriate treatment regimen, including the risks and benefits of all treatment options. CDC has published interim treatment guidance for adult patients diagnosed with central nervous system and/or parameningeal infections as well as septic arthritis associated with injection of potentially contaminated steroid products from NECC. These recommendations include treatment with an antifungal drug called voriconazole. CDC also advises providers to consider giving another antifungal drug, liposomal amphotericin B, in addition to voriconazole, to treat patients with severe disease and patients who do not respond to voriconazole alone. Providers can refer to CDC’s website at http://www.cdc.gov/hai/outbreaks/clinicians/index.html6 for the most up-to-date CDC treatment recommendations.

Q14: In your MedWatch message, FDA advised healthcare professionals to follow-up with patients who have been administered an injectable product shipped by NECC on or after May 21, 2012, including an ophthalmic drug that is injectable or used in conjunction with eye surgery, or a cardioplegic solution. Are there other clinical settings where FDA suggests healthcare professionals follow-up with patients?

A14: In addition to injectable NECC products, ophthalmic drugs used in conjunction with eye surgery, and cardioplegic solution shipped on or after May 21, 2012, there are other potential uses of NECC products where FDA advises healthcare professionals to use their clinical judgment in deciding when to follow-up with patients. Other clinical conditions that warrant follow-up with patients who received NECC products on or after May 21, 2012, include but are not limited to:

  • Infusion into a sterile body site
  • Irrigation of a sterile body site (e.g., bladder, skin laceration, intra-operative)
  • Inhalation
  • Application to an eye with a corneal abrasion
  • Transplant of an organ (e.g., organ transplant)

Q15: What advice is available for patients who may have NECC products in their implantable pump?

A15. FDA is aware of the possibility that products made and distributed by the New England Compounding Pharmacy (NECC) may have been intended for use in implantable pumps for a variety of patient populations. These products were recalled by NECC earlier this month. In some cases, the nature of the implant may make compliance with the recall notice impractical or unsafe. FDA continues to evaluate information as it becomes available, but at this time does not have sufficient data to determine the degree of risk or concern associated with any continued exposure to these products. FDA urges health care providers and clinics that purchased NECC products for use in implantable pumps to maintain a heightened vigilance for signs of infections in those patients or their pumps, and to reach out to those patients to discuss medical options available to them as appropriate.

Source: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm322735.htm

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Brower Recalls Top Hatch Egg Incubators Due to Fire Hazard

 

If you or someone you know has been injured by this product, or if you have had property damaged by this product, contact the Vogel Law Firm immediately, 865-357-1949 or email Attorney Robert Vogel at rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

Name of Product: Egg Incubator

Units: About 2,500

Manufacturer: Brower Division of Hawkeye Steel Products Inc., of Houghton, Iowa

Hazard: The base can ignite during use, posing a fire hazard to the consumer.

Incidents/Injuries: Brower received three reports of fires, all of which resulted in property damage. No injuries have been reported.

Description: The product is a round, light gray plastic egg incubator with a clear plastic top used to hatch many different types of eggs. The incubator is 18 inches in diameter and 12 inches tall. The recalled Model TH120 Brower Top Hatch Incubator has two main components - a tray and a base. A crank arm and a turner motor are located in the base. The crank arm snaps into place on the turner motor. The motor turns the crank arm which, in turn, rotates the tray. The clear plastic top has an engraving which says, "THIS SIDE UP." The model number is located on the side of the packaging box.

Sold at: Mills Fleet Farm, Stromberg's Chick and Gamebirds, Unlimited and other farm supply retailers from January 2009 to September 2010 for about $190.

Manufactured in: United States

Remedy: Consumers should immediately stop using the product and contact the company for a free replacement base.

Consumer Contact: Brower at (800) 553-1791, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. CT Monday through Friday or online at www.browerequip.com/recall.pdf


Brower THI20 Top Hatch Incubator
Brower THI20 Top Hatch Incubator


Recalled incubators have a crank arm that snaps into place. The crank arm is not connected by a screw
Recalled incubators have a crank arm that snaps into
place. The crank arm is not connected by a screw




---

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is still interested in receiving incident or injury reports that are either directly related to this product recall or involve a different hazard with the same product. Please tell us about your experience with the product on SaferProducts.gov

CPSC is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of injury or death associated with the use of the thousands of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. Deaths, injuries, and property damage from consumer product incidents cost the nation more than $900 billion annually. CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard. CPSC's work to ensure the safety of consumer products - such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters, and household chemicals - contributed to a decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 30 years.

Under federal law, it is illegal to attempt to sell or resell this or any other recalled product.

To report a dangerous product or a product-related injury, go online to: SaferProducts.gov, call CPSC's Hotline at (800) 638-2772 or teletypewriter at (301) 595-7054 for the hearing and speech impaired. Consumers can obtain this news release and product safety information at www.cpsc.gov. To join a free e-mail subscription list, please go to www.cpsc.gov/cpsclist.aspx.

Crossbow Cocking Ropes Recalled by Academy Sports Due to Laceration Hazard

 

Attention: If you or anyone you know has been injured by this or any other product, contact Attorney Robert L. Vogel at the Vogel Law Firm, 865-357-1949 or email rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

Name of Product: Game Winner® crossbow cocking ropes

Units: About 6,300

Importer: Academy Sports + Outdoors, of Katy, Texas

Hazard: The hooks attaching the cocking rope to the crossbow string can break and cause it to recoil, posing a laceration hazard.

Incidents/Injuries: The company has received four reports of the hooks on the cocking ropes breaking, causing the rope to recoil. Three of the incidents resulted in lacerations.

Description: This recall involves Game Winner® cocking ropes with model number FSGWAR3018 and UPC 400214726596. The cocking ropes help users get a better grip on the crossbow string and aid in pulling it back. They have an approximately 50-inch long black nylon rope, two black plastic hooks and two t-handles. The model and UPC numbers are located on the instruction card that comes with the product.

Sold exclusively at: Academy stores nationwide and on the company’s website www.academy.com between June 2012 and October 2012 for about $10.

Manufactured in: China

Remedy: Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled cocking ropes and return them to Academy for a full refund.

Consumer Contact: Academy Sports + Outdoors; toll-free at (888) 922-2336, from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. CT Monday through Saturday and from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. CT on Sunday, or online at www.academy.com and click on Help + Support and Product Recall Info for more information.


Academy Sports Crossbow Cocking Rope
Academy Sports Crossbow Cocking Rope




---

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is still interested in receiving incident or injury reports that are either directly related to this product recall or involve a different hazard with the same product. Please tell us about your experience with the product on SaferProducts.gov

CPSC is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of injury or death associated with the use of the thousands of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. Deaths, injuries, and property damage from consumer product incidents cost the nation more than $900 billion annually. CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard. CPSC's work to ensure the safety of consumer products - such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters, and household chemicals - contributed to a decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 30 years.

Under federal law, it is illegal to attempt to sell or resell this or any other recalled product.

To report a dangerous product or a product-related injury, go online to: SaferProducts.gov, call CPSC's Hotline at (800) 638-2772 or teletypewriter at (301) 595-7054 for the hearing and speech impaired. Consumers can obtain this news release and product safety information at www.cpsc.gov. To join a free e-mail subscription list, please go to www.cpsc.gov/cpsclist.aspx.

Communities Against Bullying

 
A crossing guard helps a childBullying can be prevented, especially when the power of a community is brought together. Community-wide strategies can help identify and support children who are bullied, redirect the behavior of children who bully, and change the attitudes of adults and youth who tolerate bullying behaviors in peer groups, schools, and communities.
If you or a loved one has been or is the victim of bullying, contact Attorney Robert L. Vogel at the Vogel Law Firm, 865-357-1949 or email rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com

The Benefits of Working Together

Bullying doesn’t happen only at school. Community members can use their unique strengths and skills to prevent bullying wherever it occurs. For example, youth sports groups may train coaches to prevent bullying. Local businesses may make t-shirts with bullying prevention slogans for an event. After-care staff may read books about bullying to kids and discuss them. Hearing anti-bullying messages from the different adults in their lives can reinforce the message for kids that bullying is unacceptable.

Potential Partners

Involve anyone who wants to learn about bullying and reduce its impact in the community. Consider involving businesses, local associations, adults who work directly with kids, parents, and youth.
  • Identify partners such as mental health specialists, law enforcement officers, neighborhood associations, service groups, faith-based organizations, and businesses.
  • Learn what types of bullying community members see and discuss developing targeted solutions.
  • Involve youth. Teens can take leadership roles in bullying prevention among younger kids.

Community Strategies

Study community strengths and needs:
  • Ask: Who is most affected? Where? What kinds of bullying happen most? How do kids and adults react? What is already being done in our local area to help?
  • Think about using opinion surveys, interviews, and focus groups to answer these questions. Learn how schools assess bullying.
  • Consider open forums like group discussions with community leaders, businesses, parent groups, and churches.
Develop a comprehensive community strategy:
  • Review what you learned from your community study to develop a common understanding of the problem.
  • Establish a shared vision about bullying in the community, its impact, and how to stop it.
  • Identify audiences to target and tailor messages as appropriate.
  • Describe what each partner will do to help prevent and respond to bullying.
  • Advocate for bullying prevention policies in schools and throughout the community.
  • Raise awareness about your message. Develop and distribute print materials. Encourage local radio, TV, newspapers, and websites to give public service announcements prime space. Introduce bullying prevention to groups that work with kids.
  • Track your progress over time. Evaluate to ensure you are refining your approach based on solid data, not anecdotes.

Additional Resources

Preventing Bullying at School

  
A teacher talks to her classBullying can threaten students’ physical and emotional safety at school and can negatively impact their ability to learn. The best way to address bullying is to stop it before it starts. There are a number of things school staff can do to make schools safer and prevent bullying.

If you or a loved one is or has suffered from bullying, contact Attorney Robert L. Vogel at the Vogel Law Firm: 865-357-1949 or email rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com

Getting Started

Assess school prevention and intervention efforts around student behavior, including substance use and violence. You may be able to build upon them or integrate bullying prevention strategies. Many programs help address the same protective and risk factors that bullying programs do.

Assess Bullying in Your School

Conduct assessments in your school to determine how often bullying occurs, where it happens, how students and adults intervene, and whether your prevention efforts are working.

Engage Parents and Youth

It is important for everyone in the community to work together to send a unified message against bullying. Launch an awareness campaign to make the objectives known to the school, parents, and community members. Establish a school safety committee or task force to plan, implement, and evaluate your school's bullying prevention program.

Create Policies and Rules

Create a mission statement, code of conduct, school-wide rules, and a bullying reporting system. These establish a climate in which bullying is not acceptable. Disseminate and communicate widely.

Build a Safe Environment

Establish a school culture of acceptance, tolerance and respect. Use staff meetings, assemblies, class and parent meetings, newsletters to families, the school website, and the student handbook to establish a positive climate at school. Reinforce positive social interactions and inclusiveness.

Educate Students and School Staff

Build bullying prevention material into the curriculum and school activities. Train teachers and staff on the school’s rules and policies. Give them the skills to intervene consistently and appropriately.

source: http://www.stopbullying.gov/prevention/at-school/index.html

How to Talk About Bullying

If you or someone you know is a victim of bullying, contact Robert L. Vogel at the Vogel Law Firm, 865-357-1949 or eamil rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com
 
A daughter and father talkParents, school staff, and other caring adults have a role to play in preventing bullying. They can:

Help Kids Understand Bullying

Kids who know what bullying is can better identify it. They can talk about bullying if it happens to them or others. Kids need to know ways to safely stand up to bullying and how to get help.
  • Encourage kids to speak to a trusted adult if they are bullied or see others being bullied. The adult can give comfort, support, and advice, even if they can’t solve the problem directly. Encourage the child to report bullying if it happens.
  • Talk about how to stand up to kids who bully. Give tips, like using humor and saying “stop” directly and confidently. Talk about what to do if those actions don’t work, like walking away
  • Talk about strategies for staying safe, such as staying near adults or groups of other kids.
  • Urge them to help kids who are bullied by showing kindness or getting help.
  • Watch the short webisodes and discuss them with kids.

Keep the Lines of Communication Open

Research tells us that children really do look to parents and caregivers for advice and help on tough decisions. Sometimes spending 15 minutes a day talking can reassure kids that they can talk to their parents if they have a problem. Start conversations about daily life and feelings with questions like these:
  • What was one good thing that happened today? Any bad things?
  • What is lunch time like at your school? Who do you sit with? What do you talk about?
  • What is it like to ride the school bus?
  • What are you good at? What would do you like best about yourself?
Talking about bullying directly is an important step in understanding how the issue might be affecting kids. There are no right or wrong answers to these questions, but it is important to encourage kids to answer them honestly. Assure kids that they are not alone in addressing any problems that arise. Start conversations about bullying with questions like these:
  • What does “bullying” mean to you?
  • Describe what kids who bully are like. Why do you think people bully?
  • Who are the adults you trust most when it comes to things like bullying?
  • Have you ever felt scared to go to school because you were afraid of bullying? What ways have you tried to change it?
  • What do you think parents can do to help stop bullying?
  • Have you or your friends left other kids out on purpose? Do you think that was bullying? Why or why not?
  • What do you usually do when you see bullying going on?
  • Do you ever see kids at your school being bullied by other kids? How does it make you feel?
  • Have you ever tried to help someone who is being bullied? What happened? What would you do if it happens again?
Get more ideas for talking with children about life and about bullying. If concerns come up, be sure to respond.
There are simple ways that parents and caregivers can keep up-to-date with kids’ lives.
  • Read class newsletters and school flyers. Talk about them at home.
  • Check the school website
  • Go to school events
  • Greet the bus driver
  • Meet teachers and counselors at “Back to School” night or reach out by email
  • Share phone numbers with other kids’ parents
Teachers and school staff also have a role to play.

Encourage Kids to Do What They Love

Help kids take part in activities, interests, and hobbies they like. Kids can volunteer, play sports, sing in a chorus, or join a youth group or school club. These activities give kids a chance to have fun and meet others with the same interests. They can build confidence and friendships that help protect kids from bullying.

Model How to Treat Others with Kindness and Respect

Kids learn from adults’ actions. By treating others with kindness and respect, adults show the kids in their lives that there is no place for bullying. Even if it seems like they are not paying attention, kids are watching how adults manage stress and conflict, as well as how they treat their friends, colleagues, and families.

http://www.stopbullying.gov/prevention/talking-about-it/index.html

Bullying Epidemic

What follows is a wonderful, extended quotation from a Bullying case from New York. The commentary is brilliant, and it clearly lays out the problems and issues that arise when a school system fails to protect students from bullying behavior. I plan on using this in my the Complaint I am filing in Federal Court this week. I hope you find it interesting.

Bob Vogel - rlvogel@robertvogellaw.com

1.      "In 1995, the United States Congress authorized the Safe Schools Act, 20 U.S.C. § 5961, so that students can be educated in an environment that was safe and free from violence. Both have received strong public support and have been reauthorized many times.

2.      "Were bullying characterized as a disease affecting America's youth, a team from the Center for Disease Control charged with investigating epidemics would have been called in to study it. The problem is pervasive; it is perceived by educators as serious, particularly in the middle school years.

3.      "Over 40 percent of teachers and support staff surveyed indicated that bullying was a moderate or major problem in their school, with 62% indicating that they witnessed two (2) or more incidents of bullying in the last month, 41% witnessed bullying once a week or more. It is the most common type of violence in our schools.

4.      "The issue first received the attention of the American public after the 1999 shooting at Columbine High School that killed 15 students and wounded 2 dozen more. As part of the investigation that followed the Columbine massacre, the Secret Service examined 37 shooting incidents. They determined that in two-thirds (2/3) of those cases, the shooter described feeling bullied, persecuted, or threatened at school. One of the shooters stated, 'I just remember life not being much fun," the shooter recalls, "reject, retard, loser. I remember stick boy a lot cause I was so thin.'

5.      "More recent stories of bullied victims taking their own lives have become common. Internationally, the study of bullying was triggered by the suicide of three (3) young boys in Norway in the 1980s. Some one-third (1/3) of students are engaging in aggressive behavior directed at their peers, oftentimes with the goal of increasing their popularity.

6.      "National leaders and educators continue to work toward a solution. President Obama held a summit and announced new federal programs that are aimed at 'dispelling the myth that bullying is just a harmless rite of passage, or inevitable part of growing up.' Presidential summits and school shootings achieve headlines, but the day-to-day adverse affects in bullying in damaging educational opportunities to students are as real as they are unnoticed. It is a problem that effects the school performance, emotional well-being, mental health, and social development of school children throughout the United States. Whether the child is the victim, aggressor, or merely a bystander, research shows that those in close vicinity to bullying are adversely marked.

7.      "Bullying is not a new phenomenon; literature is blotted with bullies, and many people have had personal experience with a schoolyard antagonist. The bully-victim relationship is characterized by a real or perceived imbalance of power and encompasses a variety of negative acts that are carried out repeatedly over time. Negative actions can broadly be described as inflicting, or attempting to inflict discomfort upon another. Indirect, psychological bullying, in the form of exclusion and isolation, is often less visible, but not less corrosive.

8.      "'The consensus among physicians and social scientists, educators and youth development organizations, civil rights advocates and law enforcement is that bullying is neither inevitable nor normal.'  Despite this consensus, bullying continues to occur at an alarming rate. A study by a group of psychologists provides an illustration. While observing groups of kindergarten and first-grade students, researchers noted an incident of bullying on the playground every three (3) to six (6) minutes.

9.      "The highest prevalence of bullying is among elementary school-aged children. Younger students of both sexes are the most likely to be singled out as victims. Children who struggle academically are more apt to be victims or both victims and aggressors. Bullying can be carried out by an individual or a group. The victim of school bullying is most often a single person.

10.  "'Initially, victimization is situational; only over time does the field of children who are consistently victimized become narrowed on the basis of ongoing experience.'  There is a finding that once a child is labeled a victim, his status within the peer group drops. This leads to a subset of children being caught up in a 'vicious cycle in which victimization and maladjustment feed off one another.' 

11.  "'Youth who are victimized are likely marginalized from the main-stream peer group, lacking access to pro-social peers who provide role models of appropriate social skills, and also protection against bullying.'  The most common place for victimization in elementary school is the playground, followed by the classroom and gym class.

12.  "Legislatures across the country have been taking note of the problem in schools. In recent years, forty-five (45) states have passed laws dealing with bullying and harassment in schools.

13.  "Every disagreement among children does not amount to bullying. 'What distinguishes bullying from other forms of childhood aggression, whether a hard-fought basketball game or rough-and-tumble play, is unequal and coercive power.'  It must be stressed that the term bullying is not used when two (2) students of approximately the same strength are fighting or quarreling. Increased power need not be actually present, but there must be at least a perceived advantage for the bully, either physically or psychologically. The bully/victim connection can be viewed as the opposite of a healthy peer relationship. Peers are equals on the same social standing, while a bullying nexus lacks equality of standing. It is the inequality, abuse, and unfairness associated with bullying that makes it incompatible with what we conceive as the appropriate 'American character.'

14.  "Children of both genders experience the gamut of bullying behavior. Boys are more likely to bully and to be bullied than girls. When they do bully, boys are inclined to engage in direct bullying such as hitting or taunting, while bullying among girls most often takes the indirect form of social exclusion or rejection. Boys physically striking one another and girls harassing with their words has become an accepted part of peer culture.

15.  "Children interact in various settings:  school, home, church, neighborhoods. Within each, there are risk factors. How children interact in these various backgrounds helps to define bullying and why children engage in it. 'There is no one single causal factor for bullying.'

16.  "When asked why certain children are selected for ridicule, students typically point to external differences such as 'obesity, red hair, an unusual dialect, or wearing glasses.'  Research does not support this conclusion. The one external characteristic that is likely to play a role in whether a male child will be bullied is lack of physical strength. This does not hold true for girls, however, who are more likely to bully those who are actually physical stronger than they are. Differences among students in areas such as religion, disability, or ethnicity have the ability to effect the struggle for power among young people and lead to a student being singled out as an object of harassment.

17.  "Several other factors play a major role in determining what makes students more likely to bully. One is the climate of the school. When a school is not supportive, or is negative, bullying thrives. When teachers down-play bullying or view it as kids being kids, bullying rates are high.

18.  "One study suggests that the aura of the school with respect to bullying has more to do with whether bullying occurs than the behavior of the victim. The school's atmosphere includes the disciplinary system, preventive policies, the architecture of the building itself, resources, support services, and morale. School control is at its worse when staff and dominant students model this behavior, bullying is ignored or reinforced, or is accepted as normal and expected.

19.  "Parents play a role in determining whether someone is likely to bully. Bullies tend to come from homes with 'low cohesion, little warmth, absent fathers, high power needs that permit aggressive behavior, physical abuse, poor family functioning and authoritarian parenting. Those who are both bully and victim come from families with physical abuse, domestic violence, hostile mothers, powerless mothers, uninvolved parents, neglect, low warmth, inconsistent discipline, and negative environment.'

20.  "Bullying may also be the result of a life cycle where students believe it is simply their turn to play the abusing role. A student explained he was bullying a younger student because he thought it was his turn to do so. Children use bullying to demonstrate to their peer group that they are able to dominate. In this way, bullying becomes a social event where the dominance of the bully is put on display for an audience. Research demonstrates that in 90% of observed cases, a bully was playing to an audience. Even though a vast majority of students report that they find it unpleasant to report bullying, the vast majority of bullying episodes have an audience. 'Thus, the problem of bullying is also a problem of the unresponsive bystander, whether that bystander is a classmate who finds the harassment to be funny, or a peer who sits on the sidelines, afraid to get involved, or an educator who sees bullying as just another part of growing up.'

21.  "For those students who are connected with their social group, bullying serves as a way to control their peers. For those bullies who are excluded by their peers, bullying represents a way to lash out at a social system that keeps them on the periphery.  A majority of bullies who are marginalized are male; students being controlled by their peer group are evenly split between both genders.

22.  "These bullies who are integrated within their peers' social groups are easy to ignore or mischaracterize – leading two (2 ) researchers to describe them as 'hidden in plain sight.'  They have a variety of friends and possess strengths such as good social skills, athleticism, and attractiveness.

23.  "Culture is weighty in determining why someone will bully. Television, video games, and the internet may be linked to increased aggression and an increased likelihood for bullying behavior.  These influences, if they have any effect at all, are not as strong as other cultural influences such as the neighborhood and the environment in which the child is raised.

24.  "If nothing is done to rectify the situation, a bully is likely to continue bullying and victimization continues. Thus, without a change in the dynamic, a child who suffers at the hands of a tormentor is unlikely to be able to escape, and the effects of bullying are likely to continue unabated. Each child can be bully, victim or bystander, and with each of those labels comes different, but often related, consequences.

25.  "The typical victim of bullying is more anxious and insecure than his or her peers. She [or he] is more likely to be quiet, sensitive and have low self-esteem. It is important to note, however, that not all victims react in the same way. 'Students who are bullied in school have no escape from bullying other than feigning illness and staying home, which is a very temporary reprieve.'  Not surprisingly, being a victim is most strongly associated with the feeling that one did not belong at school, and in increase in the classroom days missed. 'Feeling as though one did not belong at school was most strongly associated with being a victim; the odds of members of this group being a victim were 4.1 times higher than those who felt they belonged at school.'  'For students who felt sad most days, their odds of being a victim were 1.8 times higher than the odds of being a victim among those who did not feel sad most days. Being sad most days is known to be a precursor or diagnosis of major depression.'

26.  "'The take home message is that elementary school-aged children…who struggle academically are more likely to be victims or bully-victims.'  Bullying brings with it a whole host of other issues. It impairs concentration and leads to poor academic performance. Additionally, victims are more likely to engage in antisocial behavior, have increased health problems, and struggle to adjust emotionally. Being the victim of bullying is related to sliding grades, absenteeism, poor academic achievement, being lonely, exhibiting withdrawal behaviors, difficulty acting assertively, or being aggressive. Youth involved in bullying – as bully, victim or both – consistently reported significantly higher levels of health problems, poor emotional adjustment and poor school adjustment than non-involved youth. Victims and bully-victims also consistently reported significantly poorer relationships with classmates than uninvolved youths.

27.  "Victims who are friends of a non-victim peer are less likely to internalize problems such as feelings of depression and sadness.  Even children as young as those in first grade who have one (1) friend and do not suffer in isolation, have fewer problems than children who have no peer to rely upon. 'The victims are lonely and abandoned at school. As a rule, they do not have a single good friend in their class.'  This solitude perpetuates feelings of shame and unattractiveness, and a belief that the victim is stupid.

28.  "Children with feelings of rejection and loneliness, withdraw and have trouble making new friends. 'Withdrawal because the child is rejected by peers places the child at greater risk of isolation than is the case of children who prefer to play alone or are socially anxious.'  Victims have lower self-esteem and begin blaming themselves for what is happening. 'Self-esteem drops once a child becomes a victim…they blame themselves for being victimized and give in quickly or respond in a disorganized manner when they are teased or bullied.'  'Self-views are unlikely to change for the better, unless the child who has been victimized becomes more accepted in the group.' 

29.  "The end of school does not bring an end to the damage done by years of harassment. As a result of this trapped setting, where harassment is a repeated occurrence, victims carry lasting emotional and psychological scars into adulthood. A study found that those who were bullied for at least three (3) years in grade six (6) through nine (9), had higher rates of depressive symptoms and lower self-esteem when they were 23 years old.

30.  "Not surprisingly, a bully is likely to have an aggressive attitude. He will probably have a positive attitude towards violence and a strong self-image. Typically, he will be of average popularity and often will be surrounded by a small group of friends who support him.

31.  "'The bullies don't do well later on.'  Despite his center position in the school social hierarchy, the impact of being the bully will leave a lasting adverse mark. Perpetrators of bullying report being sad most days, and have somewhat the same depressive symptoms as victims. 'Students who felt unsafe and sad most days had 2.5 and 1.5 times the odds of being a bully.'  Bullies themselves typically have more health problems and poor emotional adjustment than students not involved in bullying.

32.  "Bullying behavior may simply be the beginning of an antisocial behavioral pattern that will endure during the tormentor's entire life. Those students who start bullying early on in their academic lives are more likely to assault or sexually harass their classmates in high school. As young people continue to grow up, bullying may be a precursor to violence in dating.

33.  "Bullies and bully-victims, but not victims, consistently reported significantly more alcohol use. Bullying can also be viewed as a component of a more generally antisocial and rule-breaking conduct disordered behavior pattern. From this perspective, it is natural to predict that youngsters who are aggressive and bully others, run a clearly increased risk of later engaging in other problem behaviors, such as criminality and alcohol abuse. A number of recent studies confirm their general prediction. Additionally, bullies are more likely than non-bullies to commit a felony in the future. One study indicated that bullying was clearly a precursor to later violent behavior for this group, although, of course, not all bullies would persist along this pathway towards violence. In one study, 60% of boys identified as bullies in grade six (6) to nine (9), had at least one (1) conviction by age 24, and 35% to 45% of them had three (3) or more convictions. This is a four-fold increase in the level of criminality over that of non-bullies. Victims had an average, or below average, chance of engaging in future criminality.

34.  "'Chronic bullying has a cost for society, as well as for the individual and, of course, the victim.'  The children who they harass are left to try to move on after years of uncontroverted harassment.  The bullies themselves, through their own actions, are more likely to require social services, educational services, and criminal justice services.

35.  "Bullies typically operate in front of a crowd, and the students who act as onlookers do not escape the effects of bullying. These students, who often watch, or even step away from the bullying actions, are more likely to feel powerless and to be fearful at school. Bystanders feel as though they are incapable of controlling the situation, and thus are not themselves safe.

36.  "Students may go along with the group and the bullying behavior out of fear that if they were to speak up, they might lose their space within the peer group and open themselves up to be the next victim. As times goes on, if bullying persists at a high level, bystanders become desensitized and are less willing to step in to prevent the harassment." 

T.K. and S.K., individually, and on behalf of L.K. vs. New York City Department of Education, 779 F.Supp.2d 289 (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, April 25, 2011) (internal citations omitted).